Hi Sergiu,

Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
> On 01/29/2010 09:46 PM, Norbert Sándor wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm experimenting with the RichTextArea (RTA) in a separate application,
>> not in XWiki.
> 
> Hi Norbert,
> 
> That is great, we've been waiting for other applications to try and 
> integrate the editor, since so far only in theory can it be reused by 
> external applications, nobody tried it. We hope that this goes smoothly 
> and nothing serious prevents the integration, and we'll help each other 
> to fix any issues.
> 
>> I checked out the xwiki-gwt-dom and xwiki-gwt-user, and RTA seems to
>> work well. (Until now I've created only a small demo application, with
>> an RTA and some buttons to execute various commands.)
> 
> We'd appreciate some feedback for this, like how much time did you spend 
> so far, do you think it was easy or not to go this far, is the 
> documentation good enough?
> 
> I'm not a developer of the WYSIWYG, so I won't be able to answer your 
> questions, but Marius will help you as soon as he can.
> 
>> My questions are:
>>
>>     1. Pressing ENTER creates a BR element by default, is it possible to
>>        create a P instead?
>>        (The behaviour of the ENTER key inside a P can be set by executing
>>        the insertbronreturn command, but the default document always
>>        contains a BR, and if I set the initial content to<p></p>, I
>>        cannot navigate the cursor inside the P...)
>>
>>     2. Is there a way to listen to selection events?
>>        (I want to enable/disable some buttons based on the current
>>        selection.)
>>
>>     3. Are there any extensions to the default RTA in the other parts of
>>        XWiki?
>>        (I mean for example commands and controls for editing TABLEs
>>        visually, toolbars that are enabled/disabled based on the content
>>        of the RTA, etc. - I haven't looked at all the source code yet,
>>        it's huge :)
>>
>> That's for a starter :)
>> Thanks for your help in advance!
>>
>> Best regards:
>> --
>> Norbert Sándor
> 
> I looked at your blog, and I saw this entry which I think we could 
> benefit from in our build, since compiling the GWT code is the most 
> resource consuming step in the build, except for running the integration 
> tests.
> 
> Marius, could you take a look at
> http://jvminside.blogspot.com/2010/01/gwt-2-debugging-and-compiling-faq.html 
> 

> I think that -XdisableCastChecking will improve runtime performance, and 

2.2M2 release was built with -XdisableCastChecking on. The result is 
that the size of the generated code is a bit smaller and the number of 
method calls triggered by each key press is reduced (still around 6500 
though with all the plugins enabled, which take up to 50 milliseconds).

> -draftCompile could be used in the default build profile for faster compile.

I haven't noticed any compilation speed improvements with this flag when 
building only one permutation (e.g. FF3+en). Still around 50 seconds.

Marius

> 
>> http://jvminside.blogspot.com/
> 
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to