Hi Norbert,

Norbert Sándor wrote:
> Hello,
> 
>>  We'd appreciate some feedback
> 
> I worked with the trunk versions of xwiki-gwt-dom and xwiki-gwt-user.
> After checking them out, I slightly modified their poms (eg. removed the 
> parent declaration), then I could use them in my small example project 
> without problems.
> 
> I have much more difficulties with xwiki-web-wysiwyg, it seems to be 
> more tightly coupled with xwiki functionalities. It's sad because the 
> RichTextEditor and the plugin system would be very useful in external 
> projects as well.
> If you would split it to two projects, with the RichTextEditor and the 
> plugin system in one of them, the resulting code base would be very well 
> usable in external project as well. And seeing what you have already 
> developed, it's a waste (in the good sense of meaning of course :) that 
> this great editor is used only in xwiki. For example I think that many 
> Java projects that use fckeditor (some of my projects as well) would 
> happily switch to a gwt-based editor (and a cleaner Java-based plugin 
> system). But I understand that it would need much work to support 
> additional external requirements...

I'll send a proposal for splitting the wysiwyg module in order to make 
the editor reusable outside XWiki.

Thanks a lot for your feedback!
Marius

> 
> Best regards:
> Norbi
> 
> 
> 2010.01.30. 6:03 keltezéssel, Sergiu Dumitriu írta:
>> On 01/29/2010 09:46 PM, Norbert Sándor wrote:
>>    
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm experimenting with the RichTextArea (RTA) in a separate application,
>>> not in XWiki.
>>>      
>> Hi Norbert,
>>
>> That is great, we've been waiting for other applications to try and
>> integrate the editor, since so far only in theory can it be reused by
>> external applications, nobody tried it. We hope that this goes smoothly
>> and nothing serious prevents the integration, and we'll help each other
>> to fix any issues.
>>
>>    
>>> I checked out the xwiki-gwt-dom and xwiki-gwt-user, and RTA seems to
>>> work well. (Until now I've created only a small demo application, with
>>> an RTA and some buttons to execute various commands.)
>>>      
>> We'd appreciate some feedback for this, like how much time did you spend
>> so far, do you think it was easy or not to go this far, is the
>> documentation good enough?
>>
>> I'm not a developer of the WYSIWYG, so I won't be able to answer your
>> questions, but Marius will help you as soon as he can.
>>
>>    
>>> My questions are:
>>>
>>>      1. Pressing ENTER creates a BR element by default, is it possible to
>>>         create a P instead?
>>>         (The behaviour of the ENTER key inside a P can be set by executing
>>>         the insertbronreturn command, but the default document always
>>>         contains a BR, and if I set the initial content to<p></p>, I
>>>         cannot navigate the cursor inside the P...)
>>>
>>>      2. Is there a way to listen to selection events?
>>>         (I want to enable/disable some buttons based on the current
>>>         selection.)
>>>
>>>      3. Are there any extensions to the default RTA in the other parts of
>>>         XWiki?
>>>         (I mean for example commands and controls for editing TABLEs
>>>         visually, toolbars that are enabled/disabled based on the content
>>>         of the RTA, etc. - I haven't looked at all the source code yet,
>>>         it's huge :)
>>>
>>> That's for a starter :)
>>> Thanks for your help in advance!
>>>
>>> Best regards:
>>> --
>>> Norbert Sándor
>>>      
>> I looked at your blog, and I saw this entry which I think we could
>> benefit from in our build, since compiling the GWT code is the most
>> resource consuming step in the build, except for running the integration
>> tests.
>>
>> Marius, could you take a look at
>> http://jvminside.blogspot.com/2010/01/gwt-2-debugging-and-compiling-faq.html
>>
>> I think that -XdisableCastChecking will improve runtime performance, and
>> -draftCompile could be used in the default build profile for faster compile.
>>
>>    
>>> http://jvminside.blogspot.com/
>>>      
>>    
>>
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2655 - Release Date: 01/29/10 
>> 10:08:00
>>
>>    
> 
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to