> By the way, how did you find out about it? I was looking for range and selection API support for the GWT RTA. If I remember well then I found the XWiki SVN by googling around, but it wasn't easy :)
(rocket-gwt has some selection support as well (http://code.google.com/p/rocket-gwt/wiki/Selections), but that project does not seem to be as active as XWiki.) I plan to write a blog entry about my experiences with the XWiki RTA - if you don't mind. -- Norbi 2010.01.31. 17:35 keltezéssel, Sergiu Dumitriu írta: > On 01/31/2010 04:32 PM, Norbert Sándor wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> >>> We'd appreciate some feedback >>> >> I worked with the trunk versions of xwiki-gwt-dom and xwiki-gwt-user. >> After checking them out, I slightly modified their poms (eg. removed the >> parent declaration), then I could use them in my small example project >> without problems. >> >> I have much more difficulties with xwiki-web-wysiwyg, it seems to be >> more tightly coupled with xwiki functionalities. It's sad because the >> RichTextEditor and the plugin system would be very useful in external >> projects as well. >> If you would split it to two projects, with the RichTextEditor and the >> plugin system in one of them, the resulting code base would be very well >> usable in external project as well. And seeing what you have already >> developed, it's a waste (in the good sense of meaning of course :) that >> this great editor is used only in xwiki. For example I think that many >> Java projects that use fckeditor (some of my projects as well) would >> happily switch to a gwt-based editor (and a cleaner Java-based plugin >> system). But I understand that it would need much work to support >> additional external requirements... >> > Well, external usage was a goal from the start, so we tried to make it > as easy as possible (and as allowed by time constrains) to reuse all or > just parts of the editor. Some plugins are tightly linked to XWiki, like > the macro or link dialogs, while others could be generic, like the > improved handling of basic formatting. So far, since XWiki was the only > user and developer of the editor, the main goal was to make it work for > our needs, while the reusability was left as a secondary goal. The > larger the community around the editor, the better it would be. So > spreading the word about it to other projects would be good, something > we haven't been doing so well so far. By the way, how did you find out > about it? > > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2659 - Release Date: 01/31/10 > 07:39:00 > > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
