Hi Anca,

On Dec 15, 2009, at 7:03 PM, Anca Luca wrote:

> Hi Vincent,
> 
> It sounds pretty good to me.
> There are a few items we need to make sure we implement right (making it 
> clear 
> what's commercial and what's open on xwiki.org, the 'rules' for getting the 
> offer listed, etc), but those are matters of the actual implementation and 
> not 
> the idea itself.
> 
> On 12/04/2009 04:44 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
>> Hi everyone (devs and users),
>> 
>> While we have a clear governance for write access to our source
>> repository (http://dev.xwiki.org), we're missing a clear governance
>> for xwiki.org. The idea is to address mainly the following 2 questions:
>> 1) who "owns" it and thus "controls" (or rather provides direction
>> for)  its content
>> 2) can it be used for business advertising (support, paid packages,
>> consulting services)
>> 
>> Bit of History about XWiki SAS
>> ========================
>> 
>> - XWiki SAS (http://xwiki.com) is the company founded by Ludovic
>> Dubost the creator of XWiki (I'm the CTO of XWiki SAS in addition to
>> being a committer here).
>> - Most of the active contributors are also employed and paid by XWiki
>> SAS to develop the XWiki software. Today that's
>> -- 12.5 committers (developers)
>> -- 1 open source product manager (see 
>> http://markmail.org/thread/ggaaw4u6yyci4oan
>>   for its definition)
>> -- 1 designer
>> -- 1 tester/technical writer
>> - XWiki SAS sells services around the open source software, see 
>> http://www.xwiki.com/xwiki/bin/view/Services/
>> - XWiki SAS truly believes and understands open source, see 
>> http://www.xwiki.com/xwiki/bin/view/About/Values
>> -- I also wrote a blog post on this some time back: 
>> http://massol.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Blog/XWikiSASAndOpenSource
>> - XWiki SAS has promised "not to do evil" ;), see its manifesto at 
>> http://www.xwiki.com/xwiki/bin/view/About/Manifesto
>> - XWiki SAS is paying for the servers and maintenance of xwiki.org,
>> myxwiki.org, the maven repo, the svn repo, the hudson build serversn
>> the free JUG farm, and more
>> 
>> Issue at hand
>> ===========
>> 
>> XWiki SAS would like to generate more revenue to be able to increase
>> the development pace of the XWiki software. We'd like to fund even
>> more the development of XWiki, so that it becomes an even better
>> product. We've asked you what you'd like to see in the future in XWiki
>> and you've answered on this survey result:
>> http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Blog/Features+Survey+Results
>> 
>> We'd like to implement those features as fast as possible.
>> 
>> For this we need to ensure that users interested in commercial
>> services find easily the way to http://xwiki.com, even when they
>> arrive on xwiki.org.
>> 
>> This is true for XWiki SAS's services but also for any company willing
>> to offer services around the XWiki open source project. There's no
>> magic. Developers need to be paid when they work full time on some
>> project. We need a commercial ecosystem around XWiki for it to
>> progress as quickly as its competitors (the collaboration market). We
>> need to allow for commercial companies the ability to generate revenue
>> from their work on the XWiki open source project. However we also want
>> to continue ensuring that all the XWiki development is done in open
>> source, under a LGPL license.
>> 
>> Governance Proposal
>> =================
>> 
>> 1) xwiki.org is controlled by the XWiki committers. This means that
>> important changes brought to it should be discussed/vote on the list,
>> using the same practices as for code commits
>> 2) xwiki.org stays open in edit mode to all external contributors (and
>> XWiki committers continue to monitor it to remove spam, etc)
>> 3) we agree to start with 3 zones where companies can advertise their
>> commercial offers on top of the XWiki open source product:
>> -- On the download page (for business packages, subscriptions, hosting)
>> -- On the support page (for services: support, consulting)
>> -- (still to be defined) Possibly on a "Products" tab in the new
>> horizontal navigation. The idea would be to do as jboss.org is doing.
>> Projects are open source and community and Products are commercial
>> 4) the company offerings are listed by their amount of contributions
>> to the XWiki open source project. The company that contributes most
>> (XWiki SAS today) gets the best spots (top of the list, bigger space)
>> 5) Companies who want to be listed should provide some proof of their
>> contributions to the XWiki open source project
>> 6) XWiki SAS gets some acknowledgment for paying for the xwiki.org
>> server/maintenance of it. Probably somewhere in the footer of the site
>> or on side panel somewhere
> 
> I think this could be optional as it is included in the support XWiki SAS 
> offers 
> for XWiki.org and therefore 'rewarded' through the advertising space.

It's different. This is about the hosting of xwiki.org itself. It's not related 
to support offerings.

Thanks
-Vincent

>> 7) xwiki.org should always remain a site for the xwiki open source
>> community
>> 
>> Conclusion
>> =========
>> 
>> We want to stress that this proposal is not about XWiki SAS making a
>> commercial takeover of the xwiki.org site.
>> 
>> It's about recognizing that if the XWiki open source software
>> progresses quickly today, it's thanks to contributors but also for a
>> very large proportion to companies paying developers to work on it,
>> either directly  (like XWiki SAS or other companies that have
>> developers contributing) or indirectly (by paying for example XWiki
>> SAS or other companies to work on specific features).
>> 
>> It's also about recognizing that XWiki SAS is happy to see other
>> companies willing to contribute to the progress of the XWiki open
>> source project and thus to provide a place for these companies to be
>> visible too.
>> 
>> I hope that all our contributors but also users of the XWiki Open
>> Source software will find this proposal acceptable and I welcome any
>> feedback on it.
> 
> That would be a +1.
> 
> Thanks,
> Anca Luca
> XWiki committer, XWiki SAS employed developer.
> 
>> 
>> Thanks
>> -Vincent Massol
>> Hat 1: XWiki SAS CTO
>> Hat 2: XWiki committer
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to