Caleb, it must a simple interpretation story. That the spacemanager and invitationmanager plugins are retired is probably ok. I just don't curriki to be flagged behind a "retired" path-name; I find it ok that it depends on retired project.
paul On 14 oct. 2010, at 22:22, Caleb James DeLisle wrote: > > > On 10/14/2010 04:02 PM, Paul Libbrecht wrote: >> >> On 14 oct. 2010, at 19:10, Caleb James DeLisle wrote: >>>> Your proposal says "move Curriki to retired" ? >>> Oops, indeed it does. I meant move only xwiki-plugin-invitationmanager and >>> xwiki-plugin-spacemanager. >>> My proposal is that the historical maven builds will remain and the source >>> will still be avainable >>> in the contrib/retired section but no new builds will be created by hudson. >> >> But that would really mean the project curriki is retired or retiring. >> I think this is not correct. > > If you know what I really mean then you're a better man than me ;) > I just looked over my email history and I see there have been no changes to > InvitationManager in > over a year so continuing to build, test, and release it seems rather silly > IMO. > I would stress that this will not prevent Curriki from building since the > existing versions will > remain in maven repository. > If in the future there is desire to begin maintaining the SpaceManager or > InvitationManager once > again, I don't see why they can't come back out of retirement. > > Caleb > >> >> paul >> _______________________________________________ >> devs mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs >> > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
