On 10/14/2010 10:02 PM, Paul Libbrecht wrote: > > On 14 oct. 2010, at 19:10, Caleb James DeLisle wrote: >>> Your proposal says "move Curriki to retired" ? >> Oops, indeed it does. I meant move only xwiki-plugin-invitationmanager and >> xwiki-plugin-spacemanager. >> My proposal is that the historical maven builds will remain and the source >> will still be avainable >> in the contrib/retired section but no new builds will be created by hudson. > > But that would really mean the project curriki is retired or retiring. > I think this is not correct.
No, it means that the Curriki project is doing fine with the current versions of the plugins. And these versions are in the maven repository, and will always be there. Moving the code to the retired svn repository means just that no new development is planned for them. And, if Curriki wants to evolve, then it should upgrade to a newer version of the platform, and it should switch to components, which means new modules, not related to the plugins. -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
