On 14 oct. 2010, at 22:52, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
> On 10/14/2010 10:02 PM, Paul Libbrecht wrote: >> >> On 14 oct. 2010, at 19:10, Caleb James DeLisle wrote: >>>> Your proposal says "move Curriki to retired" ? >>> Oops, indeed it does. I meant move only xwiki-plugin-invitationmanager and >>> xwiki-plugin-spacemanager. >>> My proposal is that the historical maven builds will remain and the source >>> will still be avainable >>> in the contrib/retired section but no new builds will be created by hudson. >> >> But that would really mean the project curriki is retired or retiring. >> I think this is not correct. > > No, it means that the Curriki project is doing fine with the current > versions of the plugins. And these versions are in the maven repository, > and will always be there. Moving the code to the retired svn repository > means just that no new development is planned for them. And, if Curriki > wants to evolve, then it should upgrade to a newer version of the > platform, and it should switch to components, which means new modules, > not related to the plugins. As I said, as long as curriki itself doesn't have paths (svn or maven) that are with retired, I'm fine. Hence here's my +1. paul _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
