On Oct 25, 2010, at 2:21 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: > On 10/25/2010 12:32 PM, Vincent Massol wrote: >> Hi Sergiu, >> >> On Oct 21, 2010, at 1:08 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: >> >>> On 10/20/2010 09:31 AM, Vincent Massol wrote: >>>> The idea would be to have the following dates: >>>> - 2.6RC1: 1st of November 2010 (there's no M1) >>>> - 2.6 final: 18h of November >>> >>> I'd move the RC one week later. >> >> I actually think that 3 weeks is already almost too much actually, since >> the longest the likeliest people will introduce new features and not do >> stabilization. > > WDYM 3 weeks?
End to end, it's actually 3.5 weeks (I don't know why I put the date of 18th of Nov. I think I wanted to put 15th initially but that slipped for some reason... anyway let's keep 18th but with no slippage ;) ie we should start releasing no later than the 15th, if not earlier ;)). > When did you start counting? 1st is next week, so just one > week between 2.5 and 2.6RC1. Also, trunk became 2.6 on the 14th, so that > would be only two weeks since the 2.6 version was introduced, I really > don't understand where the 3 weeks before the RC came. Note that I only > proposed moving the RC date, not the final date. I thought you were proposing to move the final date. I'm +0 to move only the RC by one week (although this gives less time for stabilization and may result in more features being added in). A few days instead of a week would be better. We need the stabilization time as much as possible IMO. One week less means less stabilization on the new features add for RC1. Note that Raluca thinks she'll have finished the Recent Activity feature for the 1st of Nov. Thanks -Vincent >> In addition this gives less chance for people to test the stabilization >> release(s) (people only test when there are final releases). >> >> I'd really like to keep the proposed dates. Please let me know if it's ok >> with you since you're the only one who voiced a concern on the date. _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
