On 10/25/2010 02:51 PM, Vincent Massol wrote: > > On Oct 25, 2010, at 2:44 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: > >> On 10/25/2010 02:26 PM, Vincent Massol wrote: >>> >>> On Oct 25, 2010, at 2:21 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: >>> >>>> On 10/25/2010 12:32 PM, Vincent Massol wrote: >>>>> Hi Sergiu, >>>>> >>>>> On Oct 21, 2010, at 1:08 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 10/20/2010 09:31 AM, Vincent Massol wrote: >>>>>>> The idea would be to have the following dates: >>>>>>> - 2.6RC1: 1st of November 2010 (there's no M1) >>>>>>> - 2.6 final: 18h of November >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd move the RC one week later. >>>>> >>>>> I actually think that 3 weeks is already almost too much actually, since >>>>> the longest the likeliest people will introduce new features and not do >>>>> stabilization. >>>> >>>> WDYM 3 weeks? >>> >>> End to end, it's actually 3.5 weeks (I don't know why I put the date of >>> 18th of Nov. I think I wanted to put 15th initially but that slipped for >>> some reason... anyway let's keep 18th but with no slippage ;) ie we should >>> start releasing no later than the 15th, if not earlier ;)). >>> >>>> When did you start counting? 1st is next week, so just one >>>> week between 2.5 and 2.6RC1. Also, trunk became 2.6 on the 14th, so that >>>> would be only two weeks since the 2.6 version was introduced, I really >>>> don't understand where the 3 weeks before the RC came. Note that I only >>>> proposed moving the RC date, not the final date. >>> >>> I thought you were proposing to move the final date. >>> >>> I'm +0 to move only the RC by one week (although this gives less time for >>> stabilization and may result in more features being added in). A few days >>> instead of a week would be better. We need the stabilization time as much >>> as possible IMO. One week less means less stabilization on the new features >>> add for RC1. >> >> I'm +0 on either date, my statement was just a "if possible", since 18 >> days between a RC and the final release is a more than what we usually do. > > Indeed. I think I messed up the end date. what about a RC2 for the 8th of Nov. > > 2.6RC1: 1st of Nov > 2.6RC2: 8th of Nov > 2.6 final: start 15th, done for the 18th at latest
+1. >>> Note that Raluca thinks she'll have finished the Recent Activity feature >>> for the 1st of Nov. >>> >>> Thanks >>> -Vincent >>> >>>>> In addition this gives less chance for people to test the stabilization >>>>> release(s) (people only test when there are final releases). >>>>> >>>>> I'd really like to keep the proposed dates. Please let me know if it's ok >>>>> with you since you're the only one who voiced a concern on the date. -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
