On Oct 25, 2010, at 2:44 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: > On 10/25/2010 02:26 PM, Vincent Massol wrote: >> >> On Oct 25, 2010, at 2:21 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: >> >>> On 10/25/2010 12:32 PM, Vincent Massol wrote: >>>> Hi Sergiu, >>>> >>>> On Oct 21, 2010, at 1:08 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 10/20/2010 09:31 AM, Vincent Massol wrote: >>>>>> The idea would be to have the following dates: >>>>>> - 2.6RC1: 1st of November 2010 (there's no M1) >>>>>> - 2.6 final: 18h of November >>>>> >>>>> I'd move the RC one week later. >>>> >>>> I actually think that 3 weeks is already almost too much actually, since >>>> the longest the likeliest people will introduce new features and not do >>>> stabilization. >>> >>> WDYM 3 weeks? >> >> End to end, it's actually 3.5 weeks (I don't know why I put the date of 18th >> of Nov. I think I wanted to put 15th initially but that slipped for some >> reason... anyway let's keep 18th but with no slippage ;) ie we should start >> releasing no later than the 15th, if not earlier ;)). >> >>> When did you start counting? 1st is next week, so just one >>> week between 2.5 and 2.6RC1. Also, trunk became 2.6 on the 14th, so that >>> would be only two weeks since the 2.6 version was introduced, I really >>> don't understand where the 3 weeks before the RC came. Note that I only >>> proposed moving the RC date, not the final date. >> >> I thought you were proposing to move the final date. >> >> I'm +0 to move only the RC by one week (although this gives less time for >> stabilization and may result in more features being added in). A few days >> instead of a week would be better. We need the stabilization time as much as >> possible IMO. One week less means less stabilization on the new features add >> for RC1. > > I'm +0 on either date, my statement was just a "if possible", since 18 > days between a RC and the final release is a more than what we usually do.
Indeed. I think I messed up the end date. what about a RC2 for the 8th of Nov. 2.6RC1: 1st of Nov 2.6RC2: 8th of Nov 2.6 final: start 15th, done for the 18th at latest Thanks -Vincent >> Note that Raluca thinks she'll have finished the Recent Activity feature for >> the 1st of Nov. >> >> Thanks >> -Vincent >> >>>> In addition this gives less chance for people to test the stabilization >>>> release(s) (people only test when there are final releases). >>>> >>>> I'd really like to keep the proposed dates. Please let me know if it's ok >>>> with you since you're the only one who voiced a concern on the date. > > > -- > Sergiu Dumitriu > http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
