On 12/21/2010 10:25 AM, Jerome Velociter wrote: > Hi all, > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> +1, >> >> Note: this is in line with this proposal >> http://markmail.org/message/k6hb7v63igrbtxiy
It's actually a duplicate, thanks for pointing to this thread. I will consider it voted, as the other mail shows, and implement it as soon as I find the time. > > > > I'm -0.5 if we do just that just for XWiki Watch and keep the status quo for > other products (namely manager - maybe xeclipse too). Well here's how I see it: someone has to do it, and it has to start with something. This mail was just to make sure that if I do this for watch, we all agree this is what we want to do (because I overlooked the other mail, where we had actually agreed on this). In this context, -0.5 is a little strange because it sortof blocks anything to happen unless it happens for everything. Shouldn't it be good already that we do this for watch? Is it really an "all or nothing", given the fact that the strategy was already applied for workspaces and not for these other projects? Thanks, Anca > > If we look at the original proposal from march, manager is in the same boat. > And looking at facts, it is also on the backburner (no roadmap, not tested). > > I'm OK if we implement the global strategy of moving those two top level > projects to extensions. > > Jerome. > > >> >> >> JV. >> >> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Anca Luca<[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi devs, >>> >>> today XWiki Watch is a top level project, toplevel in the svn and listed >>> on the main page of xwiki.org. >>> >>> I propose we downgrade it to extension status and move its code >>> appropriately, somewhere in the plugins and applications. Along with >>> this, the standalone distribution (and installers) would also be removed. >>> The reason for this is that it makes more sense as an extension than a >>> toplevel project (it's an extra feature that you can add to XWiki by >>> installing an application and deploying a couple of jars), and also >>> because it has been on the backburner lately, and there is no roadmap to >>> make a fully featured toplevel product of it. >>> >>> Also, according to this vote >>> http://xwiki.markmail.org/thread/scrwsfqfm6b5h5zf I would like to >>> release something from the current trunk (1.1M2 probably), compatible >>> with a latest XWiki. >>> >>> I'm +1 for all these. >>> >>> WYDT? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Anca >>> _______________________________________________ >>> devs mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> devs mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs >> > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
