On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Anca Luca <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 12/21/2010 10:25 AM, Jerome Velociter wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > >> +1, > >> > >> Note: this is in line with this proposal > >> http://markmail.org/message/k6hb7v63igrbtxiy > > It's actually a duplicate, thanks for pointing to this thread. I will > consider it voted, as the other mail shows, and implement it as soon as > I find the time. > > > > > > > > > I'm -0.5 if we do just that just for XWiki Watch and keep the status quo > for > > other products (namely manager - maybe xeclipse too). > > Well here's how I see it: someone has to do it, and it has to start with > something. This mail was just to make sure that if I do this for watch, > we all agree this is what we want to do (because I overlooked the other > mail, where we had actually agreed on this). > In this context, -0.5 is a little strange because it sortof blocks > anything to happen unless it happens for everything. Shouldn't it be > good already that we do this for watch? Is it really an "all or > nothing", given the fact that the strategy was already applied for > workspaces and not for these other projects? >
No, it's not all or nothing. I'm not talking about the rest of the initial proposal from march, just about the move of top level projects. What I don't want to see is that we make the move for Watch now and that 6 months from now XEM is still in between both strategies (products vs. extensions). We only need to agree on that and for me it's OK. I'm even OK to help making the move for manager if needed. Jerome. > Thanks, > Anca > > > > > If we look at the original proposal from march, manager is in the same > boat. > > And looking at facts, it is also on the backburner (no roadmap, not > tested). > > > > I'm OK if we implement the global strategy of moving those two top level > > projects to extensions. > > > > Jerome. > > > > > >> > >> > >> JV. > >> > >> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Anca Luca<[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Hi devs, > >>> > >>> today XWiki Watch is a top level project, toplevel in the svn and > listed > >>> on the main page of xwiki.org. > >>> > >>> I propose we downgrade it to extension status and move its code > >>> appropriately, somewhere in the plugins and applications. Along with > >>> this, the standalone distribution (and installers) would also be > removed. > >>> The reason for this is that it makes more sense as an extension than a > >>> toplevel project (it's an extra feature that you can add to XWiki by > >>> installing an application and deploying a couple of jars), and also > >>> because it has been on the backburner lately, and there is no roadmap > to > >>> make a fully featured toplevel product of it. > >>> > >>> Also, according to this vote > >>> http://xwiki.markmail.org/thread/scrwsfqfm6b5h5zf I would like to > >>> release something from the current trunk (1.1M2 probably), compatible > >>> with a latest XWiki. > >>> > >>> I'm +1 for all these. > >>> > >>> WYDT? > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Anca > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> devs mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > >>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> devs mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > devs mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
