On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:23, Jerome Velociter <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Anca Luca <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> On 12/21/2010 10:25 AM, Jerome Velociter wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean >> > <[email protected]>wrote: >> > >> >> +1, >> >> >> >> Note: this is in line with this proposal >> >> http://markmail.org/message/k6hb7v63igrbtxiy >> >> It's actually a duplicate, thanks for pointing to this thread. I will >> consider it voted, as the other mail shows, and implement it as soon as >> I find the time. >> >> > >> > >> > >> > I'm -0.5 if we do just that just for XWiki Watch and keep the status quo >> for >> > other products (namely manager - maybe xeclipse too). >> >> Well here's how I see it: someone has to do it, and it has to start with >> something. This mail was just to make sure that if I do this for watch, >> we all agree this is what we want to do (because I overlooked the other >> mail, where we had actually agreed on this). >> In this context, -0.5 is a little strange because it sortof blocks >> anything to happen unless it happens for everything. Shouldn't it be >> good already that we do this for watch? Is it really an "all or >> nothing", given the fact that the strategy was already applied for >> workspaces and not for these other projects? >> > > > No, it's not all or nothing. I'm not talking about the rest of the initial > proposal from march, just about the move of top level projects. > > What I don't want to see is that we make the move for Watch now and that 6 > months from now XEM is still in between both strategies (products vs. > extensions). > > We only need to agree on that and for me it's OK. I'm even OK to help making > the move for manager if needed.
Note that there is almost nothing to do for manager, it's already plugin/application based on XE and manager.xwiki.org provide documentation on how to configure XE as a wiki farm. IMO 3.0 is a good occasion to stop release XEM distribution packages, same for watch. > > Jerome. > > > > > >> Thanks, >> Anca >> >> > >> > If we look at the original proposal from march, manager is in the same >> boat. >> > And looking at facts, it is also on the backburner (no roadmap, not >> tested). >> > >> > I'm OK if we implement the global strategy of moving those two top level >> > projects to extensions. >> > >> > Jerome. >> > >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> JV. >> >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Anca Luca<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi devs, >> >>> >> >>> today XWiki Watch is a top level project, toplevel in the svn and >> listed >> >>> on the main page of xwiki.org. >> >>> >> >>> I propose we downgrade it to extension status and move its code >> >>> appropriately, somewhere in the plugins and applications. Along with >> >>> this, the standalone distribution (and installers) would also be >> removed. >> >>> The reason for this is that it makes more sense as an extension than a >> >>> toplevel project (it's an extra feature that you can add to XWiki by >> >>> installing an application and deploying a couple of jars), and also >> >>> because it has been on the backburner lately, and there is no roadmap >> to >> >>> make a fully featured toplevel product of it. >> >>> >> >>> Also, according to this vote >> >>> http://xwiki.markmail.org/thread/scrwsfqfm6b5h5zf I would like to >> >>> release something from the current trunk (1.1M2 probably), compatible >> >>> with a latest XWiki. >> >>> >> >>> I'm +1 for all these. >> >>> >> >>> WYDT? >> >>> >> >>> Thanks, >> >>> Anca >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> devs mailing list >> >>> [email protected] >> >>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs >> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> devs mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> > devs mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs >> _______________________________________________ >> devs mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs >> > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > -- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
