On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:17, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> Thanks for your feedback on my previous mail on this topic. I've discussed
> it more with Gregory and Emilie and here's what we'd like to propose now:
>
> * Add a Profesional Services heading on the download which would contain
> ** Some text explaining about community support and linking to
> http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Support (which already describes
> community support)
> ** A livetable containing companies offering professional services for
> XWiki. The columns would be:
> *** Logo
> *** Company name
> *** Number of active committers
> *** Link to the correct anchor on the Support page (
> http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Support)
> ** The livetable would only show 3 entries
> ** The livetable would be sorted by active committers by default
> ** A text that explains how to add a new company to the list and which
> would point to the Governance page (
> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/Governance)
>
> * We will remove the current XWiki SAS support link since that information
> will be moved to the livetable
>
> * Rework the download page so that when a download link is clicked, it
> opens a new page containing the feedback questionnaire while the download
> happens
> ** Note that for this to be technically possible I propose to remove the
> link to the OW2 mirrors and instead link to the only existing mirror (OW2
> seems to have only 1...). If not, we would need some code to compute which
> OW2 mirror to use based on the location.
>
> * The feedback questionnaire page would contain the following:
> ** The following questionnaire:
> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Drafts/SatisfactionSurveyProducts(let's 
> tune the questions together)
> ** The questionnaire would start with a first question asking to which
> companies it should be sent to. We would list all companies offering
> professional support (using checkboxes) with a special text for the top one
> ("Top contributor") and in parenthesis listing the number of active
> committers. For example:
>
> [ ] XWiki SAS - Top contributor with 15 active committers
> [ ] Softec - 1 active committer
>
> ** A text explaining that it's optional and what the questionnaire will be
> used for, i.e. that
> *** it will be published anonymously on xwiki.org to improve the product
> *** it will be sent to the companies for which the user has checked the box
>
>
> We've tried to design this proposal with taking 2 ideas into account:
> 1) that it's fair and that all companies can have a fair visibility
> 2) that it's visible which companies contribute the most (to reward their
> contributions)
>
> WDYT?
>

That seems to me really fair, and you have my big +1 !
Thanks,

Denis


>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
> On Jan 10, 2011, at 11:02 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
>
> > Hi devs and everyone,
> >
> > Emilie has proposed the following content to be added to the Download
> page (http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Download):
> >
> > http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Drafts/TextDownload
> >
> > The idea is twofold:
> > 1) to get feedback about what people think about our software.
> > 2) some people who download the XWiki software from xwiki.org don't know
> that XWiki SAS has a commercial offerings and could be interested by it
> >
> > The pros for the community are:
> > 1) XWiki SAS will publish back the result of the feedback it receives
> from the download form which will allow us to fine tune and improve the
> software
> > 2) XWiki SAS could get more business (from people who want to buy
> support, dev work, hosting, etc) which will mean accrued budget for paying
> developers and resources to work on the XWiki project
> >
> > Note 1: the form would be of course optional
> > Note 2: in the future I'd like to see a not for profit foundation to
> handle xwiki.org, the xwiki open source project, donations, etc. When this
> happens we could elect from member for the foundation and have the feedback
> form sent to that foundation for example, with members of the foundation
> having access to the data (for example).
> >
> > WDYT?
> >
> > Thanks
> > -Vincent Massol, acting as both CTO of XWiki SAS and XWiki open source
> developer
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>



-- 
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
eGuilde sarl - CTO
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to