On Feb 17, 2011, at 3:27 PM, Guillaume Lerouge wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 15:24, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Guillaume,
>> 
>> On Feb 17, 2011, at 3:07 PM, Guillaume Lerouge wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 14:48, Vincent Massol <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Feb 17, 2011, at 2:38 PM, Guillaume Lerouge wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 14:32, Vincent Massol <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I've taken the liberty to refine the notion of active committer on
>>>> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/Committership
>>>>> 
>>>>> Basically the idea is that active means having at least 1 commit in a
>>>> period of 1 year (rolling period).
>>>>> 
>>>>> We had discussed this and it was hinted in the text I rewrote.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Just wanted to make sure we all agree about it.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sounds fair to me. One question: how do you decide whether I'm still
>>>> active (given my status is a bit special)?
>>>> 
>>>> You were voted in the role of "open source product manager", see
>>>> http://xwiki.markmail.org/thread/ri6acibyjkjenr76
>>>> 
>>>> Since you no longer have that role, it's a bit of a grey area.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Is that so? I see that my role is defined as:
>>> 
>>> "* Monitoring the lists for users requests/needs
>>> 
>>> * Talking to people who implement XWiki out there in the wild, in
>> companies
>>> and see what their needs are * Monitoring the enterprise wiki landscape
>> for
>>> new features we should have * Comparing XWiki with other wiki engines out
>>> there
>>> 
>>> Guillaume should provide us devs with visibility on the most wanted
>>> features and help us prepare our roadmaps."
>>> 
>>> I'm still actively doing the first 3 so I'm not sure how/when this
>> stopped
>>> being my role.
>> 
>> Links please. I don't recall any recent posting from you on the points you
>> listed above... :)
>> 
> 
> Indeed. Maybe it would be better to switch me to a "retired" / "emeritus"
> status or something similar then?

Done, see http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/HallOfFame

Thanks 
-Vincent

PS: For full transparency, I discussed with Guillaume offline about this and we 
agreed that he should be Emeritus.

> Guillaume
> 
> Thanks
>> -Vincent
>> 
>>> Guillaume
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> You tell us how you want to be considered.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> -Vincent
>>>> 
>>>>> Guillaume
>>>>> 
>>>>> This notion can be useful on:
>>>>> * the hall of fame page
>>>>> * the new download page where companies can list their number of active
>>>> committers
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> -Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to