On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 14:32, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi guys, > > I've taken the liberty to refine the notion of active committer on > http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/Committership > > Basically the idea is that active means having at least 1 commit in a > period of 1 year (rolling period). > > We had discussed this and it was hinted in the text I rewrote. I do not really disagree, but I do not remember that discussion, any pointer ? I thought initially that active committers where active until they are emeritus, and the switch is done by proposal and discussion with the concerned committer. I probably repeat myself, but there is many ways to contributes, other than purely doing a commit. Even if I do not want to plead for myself in particular here, my recent works on xwiki-store with Caleb is a good example, no commit from me, but surely a real participation in Caleb's commits. Moreover, as you have said before, actively participating is not always easy, in particular in these days, and I try to still actively participate, while focusing on points that I know well or matters most for us since I have no time for more currently. I really wish to be able to do more. Denis Just wanted to make sure we all agree about it. > > This notion can be useful on: > * the hall of fame page > * the new download page where companies can list their number of active > committers > > Thanks > -Vincent > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > -- Denis Gervalle SOFTEC sa - CEO eGuilde sarl - CTO _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
