On Feb 17, 2011, at 4:11 PM, Denis Gervalle wrote: > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 14:32, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> I've taken the liberty to refine the notion of active committer on >> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/Committership >> >> Basically the idea is that active means having at least 1 commit in a >> period of 1 year (rolling period). >> >> We had discussed this and it was hinted in the text I rewrote. > > > I do not really disagree, but I do not remember that discussion, any pointer > ? > I thought initially that active committers where active until they are > emeritus, and the switch is done by proposal and discussion with the > concerned committer. I probably repeat myself, but there is many ways to > contributes, other than purely doing a commit. Even if I do not want to > plead for myself in particular here, my recent works on xwiki-store with > Caleb is a good example, no commit from me, but surely a real participation > in Caleb's commits.
We're talking about Committers here, not contribution. You don't need to be committer to participate and contribute. Thanks -Vincent > Moreover, as you have said before, actively participating is not always > easy, in particular in these days, and I try to still actively participate, > while focusing on points that I know well or matters most for us since I > have no time for more currently. I really wish to be able to do more. > > Denis > > > > Just wanted to make sure we all agree about it. >> >> This notion can be useful on: >> * the hall of fame page >> * the new download page where companies can list their number of active >> committers >> >> Thanks >> -Vincent _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
