On 05/26/2011 04:25 AM, Luca Anca wrote: > On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 23:03 -0400, Caleb James DeLisle wrote: >> I would like to propose releasing 3.1-RC1 on the scheduled date. We (I) have >> lagged very badly with >> the milestone release dates but now is the time to get this in order. >> I would like to do the following: >> >> 1. Freeze on new features effective immediately. Everybody start working on >> stability. >> 2. Any test which is observed to pass and then fail must be @Ignored and a >> bug reported for it. > > I think these should be fixed, because they prove regressions (or are at > least a warning for a regression). > > While I agree with timeboxing, I think this is slightly too much, as in > we shouldn't push a release with regressions just because we were late > with the milestones.
When do you propose to release? Caleb > >> 3. Release happens on Monday regardless of the state of the tests. > > see above. > > Thanks, > Anca > >> >> Since the release date is upon us, I need a quick response on this. >> >> WDYT? >> >> Caleb >> >> _______________________________________________ >> devs mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
