I follow Thomas and Vincent on this. We should not hustled the release just to be on schedule.
Denis On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 14:44, Caleb James DeLisle <[email protected] > wrote: > > > On 05/26/2011 06:06 AM, Vincent Massol wrote: > > Hi Caleb, > > > > On May 26, 2011, at 5:03 AM, Caleb James DeLisle wrote: > > > >> I would like to propose releasing 3.1-RC1 on the scheduled date. We (I) > have lagged very badly with > >> the milestone release dates but now is the time to get this in order. > >> I would like to do the following: > >> > >> 1. Freeze on new features effective immediately. Everybody start working > on stability. > > > > +1 > > > >> 2. Any test which is observed to pass and then fail must be @Ignored and > a bug reported for it. > > > > +1, we should also add a keyword so that we can easily filter them out (I > propose "quarantined" or "flickering") > > > >> 3. Release happens on Monday regardless of the state of the tests. > > > > -1. For any failing test we must verify if the problem is a test issue or > a real bug. If it's a real bug we need to analyze the criticity. If it's > critical we shouldn't release without fixing it. If it's not critical then > we can release but we'll need to add this information in the Release notes > if it's a regression. > > I am happy to hold the release until you give the okay. > I volunteer to get the storage tests running. > > Caleb > > > > >> Since the release date is upon us, I need a quick response on this. > > > > Thanks > > -Vincent > > > > _______________________________________________ > > devs mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > > > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > -- Denis Gervalle SOFTEC sa - CEO eGuilde sarl - CTO _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
