On 05/26/2011 06:06 AM, Vincent Massol wrote: > Hi Caleb, > > On May 26, 2011, at 5:03 AM, Caleb James DeLisle wrote: > >> I would like to propose releasing 3.1-RC1 on the scheduled date. We (I) have >> lagged very badly with >> the milestone release dates but now is the time to get this in order. >> I would like to do the following: >> >> 1. Freeze on new features effective immediately. Everybody start working on >> stability. > > +1 > >> 2. Any test which is observed to pass and then fail must be @Ignored and a >> bug reported for it. > > +1, we should also add a keyword so that we can easily filter them out (I > propose "quarantined" or "flickering") > >> 3. Release happens on Monday regardless of the state of the tests. > > -1. For any failing test we must verify if the problem is a test issue or a > real bug. If it's a real bug we need to analyze the criticity. If it's > critical we shouldn't release without fixing it. If it's not critical then we > can release but we'll need to add this information in the Release notes if > it's a regression.
I am happy to hold the release until you give the okay. I volunteer to get the storage tests running. Caleb > >> Since the release date is upon us, I need a quick response on this. > > Thanks > -Vincent > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
