On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 07:13, Caleb James DeLisle <[email protected]> wrote: > We have 17 unresolved issues which are labeled as needed to be fixed for > 3.1-RC1. > http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator!executeAdvanced.jspa?jqlQuery=resolution+%3D+unresolved+and+fixVersion+%3D+%223.1+RC1%22&runQuery=true&clear=true > > Some of these issues are relatively new and others are quite old and have had > their fix-for version advanced at each release. > In my opinion setting a fix-for version is equivalent to making a promise to > produce a fix by a certain date. > To make a promise and fail to keep it is bad but making a habit of > periodically breaking promises and making new ones is far worse. > Since I have proposed a freeze on new features I would like to propose > removing these fix for versions. > > > WDYT?
+1 for new features/improment and not critical bug on which nobody is working on of course but I can see there is at least one recent regression in there ( XWIKI-6580 ) that should really be fixed as any known regression. It should actually be a blocker if it's really a regression. > > Caleb > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > -- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
