On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:19, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 07:13, Caleb James DeLisle > <[email protected]> wrote: >> We have 17 unresolved issues which are labeled as needed to be fixed for >> 3.1-RC1. >> http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator!executeAdvanced.jspa?jqlQuery=resolution+%3D+unresolved+and+fixVersion+%3D+%223.1+RC1%22&runQuery=true&clear=true >> >> Some of these issues are relatively new and others are quite old and have >> had their fix-for version advanced at each release. >> In my opinion setting a fix-for version is equivalent to making a promise to >> produce a fix by a certain date. >> To make a promise and fail to keep it is bad but making a habit of >> periodically breaking promises and making new ones is far worse. >> Since I have proposed a freeze on new features I would like to propose >> removing these fix for versions. >> >> >> WDYT? > > +1 for new features/improment and not critical bug on which nobody is > working on of course but I can see there is at least one recent > regression in there ( XWIKI-6580 ) that should really be fixed as any > known regression. It should actually be a blocker if it's really a > regression.
(took care of the one I know should be moved by the way) > >> >> Caleb >> >> _______________________________________________ >> devs mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs >> > > > > -- > Thomas Mortagne > -- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
