On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:20, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:19, Thomas Mortagne > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 07:13, Caleb James DeLisle >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> We have 17 unresolved issues which are labeled as needed to be fixed for >>> 3.1-RC1. >>> http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator!executeAdvanced.jspa?jqlQuery=resolution+%3D+unresolved+and+fixVersion+%3D+%223.1+RC1%22&runQuery=true&clear=true >>> >>> Some of these issues are relatively new and others are quite old and have >>> had their fix-for version advanced at each release. >>> In my opinion setting a fix-for version is equivalent to making a promise >>> to produce a fix by a certain date. >>> To make a promise and fail to keep it is bad but making a habit of >>> periodically breaking promises and making new ones is far worse. >>> Since I have proposed a freeze on new features I would like to propose >>> removing these fix for versions. >>> >>> >>> WDYT? >> >> +1 for new features/improment and not critical bug on which nobody is >> working on of course but I can see there is at least one recent >> regression in there ( XWIKI-6580 ) that should really be fixed as any >> known regression. It should actually be a blocker if it's really a >> regression. > > (took care of the one I know should be moved by the way)
I can see a lot of commits associated to XWIKI-5773 so if it's not done already it would be good to at least log in the issue what's done and left to do. > >> >>> >>> Caleb >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> devs mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Thomas Mortagne >> > > > > -- > Thomas Mortagne > -- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
