2011/10/28 Vincent Massol <[email protected]> > Hi Marius, > > On Oct 26, 2011, at 7:14 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote: > > > Hi devs, > > > > We need to decide on a technical name for the "Application Within > > Minutes", i.e. the name of the platform module and the name of the > > space that will hold the Application Within Minutes pages. For now I > > committed my code in xwiki-platform-applicationWithinMinutes and I > > used the "ApplicationWithinMinutes" space name but this is not > > consistent with the way we named modules and spaces so far. Do you > > have any suggestions? > > > > We could use simply xwiki-platform-application, but it collides with > > xwiki-platform-application-manager, and I don't think it's a good idea > > to merge them. Is application manager still used? Is it going to be > > replaced by the extension manager? > > AFAIK the Application Manager was about defining an XClass for grouping > pages together and forming an application (with a version, description, > etc). > > The Extension Manager is independent of this, it's just about > installing/upgrading/removing extensions. An application is just one type of > extension. > > So Application Manager is still a valid notion and we need it. I can think > of several use cases: > - Ability to list all applications in the wiki > - Ability to tell a user that the page he's editing is part of an > application and ensure that he really wants to modify the application (which > may require some merging later on if he upgrades the application) > - Ability to remove an application > - Ability to list applications in the Application Panel we discussed a > while ago (we talked about mapping an Application to a space but in practice > it doesn't have to be limited to that) > - Ability to export an application from the wiki as an extension and > publish it directly on extensions.xwiki.org. I envision a page listing all > applications with an export button next to them. > > AppWithinMinute would need to use the Application Manager IMO so that it > puts all pages it creates under an Application descriptor. > > So yes while AppWithinMinutes and Application Manager could be grouped > together there's no reason not to keep them separate I think. > > So ….. here are some ideas: > > * xwiki-platform-application/ --> "Application" space, i.e. what defines an > application (this is the current Application Manager) > > Then we have several possibilities for "AppWithinMinutes": > > A) xwiki-platform-appwizard/ or xwiki-platform-application-wizard/--> > "Application Wizard" or Application space > B) xwiki-platform-appwithinminutes/ or > xwiki-platform-application-within-minutes/--> "Application Within Minutes" > or Application space > C) xwiki-platform-appcreator/ or xwiki-platform-application-creator/ --> > "Application Creator" or Application space > D) xwiki-platform- appgenerator/ or xwiki-platform-application-generator > --> "Application Generator" or Application space > E) xwiki-platform-appfoundy/ or xwiki-platform-application-foundry --> > "Application Foundry" or Application space >
I don't have a strong opinion on the technical name of the component module. However the name of the space used is more than technical. It is the branding of the application so it's a very important choice that we make here. AppWithinMinutes is an important application for XWiki Enterprise as it is the feature that will show all users that XWiki's flexibility is something that is also for them and that actually brings great benefits without being too complex for non tech users. We should make sure we can communicate well around this feature. There are no proposals that are not mentioning the notion of "Application". I agree with that as we want to push the idea of Application here more than just pure form data. Now there is no proposal that says "App" and not "Application". I think "App" is more fun. It's clearly identified in people's mind. And it's shorter which makes the name less cumbersome. Now if we go this way we mostly have to discuss the suffix. In the "classical names", you've proposed Wizard, Generator, Foundry. You could have added "Builder". Now all these names are a bit overused. True they are clear, but they don't have a lot of originality. They also don't convey the fact that the building of the app is "fast". That's where "AppWithinMinutes" is better. It's more original, it conveys the fast aspect in it's name. We could also use the "Wiki" aspect of our way of building app: "WikiAppBuilder" or "WikiAppGenerator" or "WikiAppCreator". I believe it's very important that our App tool is different than anybody else's App tool. So I'm: +1 for AppWithinMinutes I could be +0.5 for WikiAppBuilder or WikiAppCreator I'm -1 for the others which have no originality. I'm -2 for "Application", I'm -2 for "Generator" or "Wizard" (we don't generate an app, we create or build it). > BTW we should probably move to using spaces in Space names when they are > compound names (for example: "Annotation Code" rather than "AnnotationCode") > since they are human-readable names and not ids. > > I'm not sure about that. The use of space makes very ugly urls. If we were to change our current policy toward space naming (which is one work or closer to camel case), we probably should go the way of the CMSes which is app-within-minutes Ludovic > My preference goes to A) (the xwiki-platform-appwizard/ short form and > "Application Wizard" space name) since I think "Wizard" is the most well > known terminology for what "AppWithinMinutes" is. > > Thanks > -Vincent > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > -- Ludovic Dubost Founder and CEO Blog: http://blog.ludovic.org/ XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com Skype: ldubost GTalk: ldubost _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
