Waooo, Don't even remember coding this one.. Must have been an initial experiment before downloading radeox and including it.
Sure +1 to remove that code Ludovic 2012/6/7 Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]>: > On 06/07/2012 02:28 AM, Ludovic Dubost wrote: >> >> Hi what would be good to do is provide à script that would detect syntax >> 1.0 docs in a xem. >> >> I'm pretty sure there is still significant 1.0 code around. Even at XWiki >> SAS we have still a lot on our own xem > > > This isn't about the xwiki/1.0 syntax, but about the even older wikiwiki > syntax. Here's a summary: > > This is =code formatting= > This is *bold formatting* > This is _italic formatting_ > This is __bold and italic formatting__ > * List item > * but sublists are indented with groups of three spaces > * so this is a third level list item > Links are created by Space.CamelCase words, or just CamelCase words > > The xwiki/1.0 rendering engine will remain in place for the moment. > > >> We could have an option to load it on demand but have that option off by >> default >> >> Ludovic >> >> Envoyé de mon iPhone >> >> Le 7 juin 2012 à 00:51, Sergiu Dumitriu<[email protected]> a écrit : >> >>> Hi devs, >>> >>> Most of the devs know about the new xwiki-rendering engine which provides >>> the support for the new xwiki/2.x syntaxes, and the old Radeox-based >>> rendering engine which provides support for the xwiki/1.0 syntax, but I >>> wonder who knows about the Oro-based wikiwiki engine that provides support >>> for an even older undocumented wiki syntax? That one has been in the oldcore >>> sources before I came in contact with XWiki, and it has been disabled for a >>> very long time. >>> >>> One thing that we still use from that basic rendering engine is the >>> support for {pre}{/pre} code escaping, and that one will have to be >>> preserved even if we remove all the rest. >>> >>> The advantages of removing it include: >>> - less ancient, unused, buggy code >>> -- thus slightly less PermGen memory required and faster startup >>> - one less Oro dependency (a long term goal is to remove Oro and ECS from >>> our dependencies) >>> - fewer WTFs from people stumbling over that code >>> >>> Does anybody know of any users of that syntax? Is anybody still running >>> 0.1.x versions? > > > > -- > Sergiu Dumitriu > http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ -- Ludovic Dubost Founder and CEO Blog: http://blog.ludovic.org/ XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com Skype: ldubost GTalk: ldubost _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
