Big +1 to remove that, I never known we had this syntax and I'm sure nobody use it.
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi devs, > > Most of the devs know about the new xwiki-rendering engine which provides > the support for the new xwiki/2.x syntaxes, and the old Radeox-based > rendering engine which provides support for the xwiki/1.0 syntax, but I > wonder who knows about the Oro-based wikiwiki engine that provides support > for an even older undocumented wiki syntax? That one has been in the oldcore > sources before I came in contact with XWiki, and it has been disabled for a > very long time. > > One thing that we still use from that basic rendering engine is the support > for {pre}{/pre} code escaping, and that one will have to be preserved even > if we remove all the rest. > > The advantages of removing it include: > - less ancient, unused, buggy code > -- thus slightly less PermGen memory required and faster startup > - one less Oro dependency (a long term goal is to remove Oro and ECS from > our dependencies) > - fewer WTFs from people stumbling over that code > > Does anybody know of any users of that syntax? Is anybody still running > 0.1.x versions? > -- > Sergiu Dumitriu > http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs -- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
