4 +1 and one +0 for BlockList, doing it now On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi devs, > > In many APIs we sometime want to manipulate several Block but we don't > want to put them in a meaningful Block like XDOM which is supposed to > mean a full document. Right now the only way to do it is to have both > an API with Block and another with Collection<Block> but it's a bit > more annoying for return type where you are forced to return a > List<Block> even if you are in a case where you actually have only one > Block to return like in macros for example. > > We talked a long time ago with Vincent about a BlockCollection which > would not have any meaning (i.e. no corresponding event in the stream > rendering API) and would just be here to be able to pass several > blocks as a Block. > > Since UI extension is going to use it a lot I propose to introduce it now. > > WDYT ? > > Any better idea for the name ? > > Here is my +1. > > -- > Thomas Mortagne
-- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
