On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Thomas Mortagne > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Oct 1, 2012, at 11:16 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I'm changing my vote to -0 for BlockList FTM since I've just realized >>>> there might a problem. >>>> >>>> BlockList means that it's a list of block. But this is not what it is… >>>> >>>> It's a Block like any other block. The important part is not that it's a >>>> list of blocks, all our blocks are list of blocks. >>>> >>>> The important part is that it can be used to hold one or several blocks. >>> >>> More precisely, compared to the other existing block this is a type of >>> block that add no additional metadata. >>> >>> It's a no op block basically. >>> >>> The fact that it's a list of Block is a feature of all blocks so this one >>> doesn't need to mention that explicitly I think. >>> >>> ATM I prefer CompositeBlock than BlockList which I find a bit misleading. >>> >>> NoOpBlock would be ok too I guess but I don't like it too much. >>> >>> I'm very close to -1 for BlockList. >> >> I'm OK with CompositeBlock. >> >> I don't have much more argument than "BlockList sounds nicer" so for >> now you win. >> >
> I think CompositeBlock sounds even better. +1 Thanks, Marius > > JV. > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
