On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Oct 1, 2012, at 11:16 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I'm changing my vote to -0 for BlockList FTM since I've just realized there >>> might a problem. >>> >>> BlockList means that it's a list of block. But this is not what it is… >>> >>> It's a Block like any other block. The important part is not that it's a >>> list of blocks, all our blocks are list of blocks. >>> >>> The important part is that it can be used to hold one or several blocks. >> >> More precisely, compared to the other existing block this is a type of block >> that add no additional metadata. >> >> It's a no op block basically. >> >> The fact that it's a list of Block is a feature of all blocks so this one >> doesn't need to mention that explicitly I think. >> >> ATM I prefer CompositeBlock than BlockList which I find a bit misleading. >> >> NoOpBlock would be ok too I guess but I don't like it too much. >> >> I'm very close to -1 for BlockList. > > I'm OK with CompositeBlock. > > I don't have much more argument than "BlockList sounds nicer" so for > now you win. >
I think CompositeBlock sounds even better. JV. _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
