All propositions are nice. However, this is my point of view. # Variant 2.1: Enumeration probably isn't a good option; it works when you have 2 languages, it begins to cause problems when you have 20 (visual annoyance, possible problem of UI alignement)
but visual of 2.1.1 is nice :-) # Variant 2.2: This is my preferred view. I'm not sure which one of the subvariant is the best but I would eliminate the first one for the same reason as 2.3 (see below). However, the user will click in order to load another page/content, then a link like 2.2.2 would be better? # Variant 2.3: I'm against adding another big button in the UI. The strength of Flamingo is for me that it is far more visually light that Colibri. # Variant 2.4: This seems to be a good solution, as well as 2.2. Just personal, I would go for the 2.2 instead of 2.4 because language is part of the content and should be displayed without clicking on a button. This is only my point of view. Hope this helps. On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 06:34:26PM +0300, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) wrote: > Hi devs, > > We have http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-10745 (Improve the display of > available languages in Flamingo) which is related to > http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-6402 (Separate Interface language and > page language settings) > > While in Flamingo we could just make the language links look better, > without changing the functionality, for the future, the separation is > something we might want to tackle, that's why I've created this proposal > page > http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/InterfaceAndContentLanguageSeparation > > I am interested in what you think about the variants. > > Thanks, > Caty > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs -- Jean SIMARD <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
