Hello, I'm +1 for the this proposal.
I like pretty much these variants: 2.2.1, 2.2.3, 2.3 and 2.4. Andreea On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Silvia Rusu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > +1 for the Interface Language proposal. > > For Content Language I like 2.1.1 and 2.2.1, with a preference for > 2.2.1, since it scales better. > > What I wonder is whether all users will make the distinction between > the Interface Language and Content Language. Below the title we could > elaborate a bit the text to provide more context from > "Available/Current language(s)" to "Available/Current language(s) for > this document / page". > It's true though that that content languages are displayed right below > the title in the 2.1 and 2.2 proposals so normally there shouldn't be > confusions, but it might be interesting to test with a few users > whether they can make the distinction. > > Thanks, > Silvia > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
