Hi Cathy, 2.1.1 is the one I prefer, 2.1.2 is also good but the separation between language should be more clear, and it is less easy to see the active one. I have no fear about the scaling issue, even heavily multilingual site like those of the European Commission use such enumeration without issue. And as Guillaume said, it is really rare to have more than a few languages anyway. Other proposal implies multiple click/touch for the same purpose, which is bad IMO for content. It is also important to only display effectively available languages, but with an enum, it could be also good to have the option to also display unavailable one greyed, so language keep their location on screen.
Regarding the UI language, 1.1 is fine, but maybe a bit large. Having only initial in the bar would be better IMO. Having also a more fancy solution, like what I have done with bluebird (see http://softec.lu), could be nice to have as well... or a easy way to customize it that way with an extension. Thanks, On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi devs, > > We have http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-10745 (Improve the display of > available languages in Flamingo) which is related to > http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-6402 (Separate Interface language and > page language settings) > > While in Flamingo we could just make the language links look better, > without changing the functionality, for the future, the separation is > something we might want to tackle, that's why I've created this proposal > page > > http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/InterfaceAndContentLanguageSeparation > > I am interested in what you think about the variants. > > Thanks, > Caty > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > -- Denis Gervalle SOFTEC sa - CEO _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
