Hi, Vote 1: Contributor received 5 +1 binding, and 1 +1 non binding votes.
Thanks for your votes. On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for 1. > > On 11/26/2014 08:21 AM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We have discussed this subject multiple times, but we don't have an > > official vote and conclusion on the topic. > > > > Problem: In JIRA who is the Assignee of an issue fixed by a Pull Request? > > 1: Contributor > > - he provided the solution > > - giving the attributions, the contributor might feel encouraged to > > contribute more > > - we could do some JIRA statistics on external contributions, but this > use > > case can be covered by GitHub statistics > > > > 2: Committer > > - he does the merging on his account and he becomes responsible for the > > committed code. > > - in case there are problems, the committer needs to find solution, since > > we can't rely on contributors availability > > - in doing the PR review, the committer spends a lot of time analyzing > and > > testing the provided solution > > > > We are talking here about complete solutions provided by the PR, since in > > case of partial solutions, the committer can assign himself on the issue > > (depends on the quantity of modification he does). > > > > Let me know what you think, > > Caty > > -- > Sergiu Dumitriu > http://purl.org/net/sergiu > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
