That's because it is rather new and the xml flurry has been quite sleepy
(e.g. the general xml mailing list at apache.org is dead).
A better measure stab would be to estimate how central the role of XML
is in these projects. DOM and SAX is typically used when one has to
parse just a bit.

Paul

On 11/06/15 16:19, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
> A quick code search on openhub and github:
>
> * library | openhub | github
> * org.w3c.dom | 180k [1] | 1.1m [2]
> * jdom 1 | 35k [3] | 112k [4]
> * stax | 25k [5] | 127k [6]
> * jdom 2 | 2k [7] | | 20k [8]
>
> It seems that jdom2 is not that popular, at least not in the projects
> tracked by openhub or hosted on github.
>
> [1] http://code.openhub.net/search?s=%22import%20org.w3c.dom%22
> [2] https://github.com/search?q="import+org.w3c.dom"&type=Code
> [3] http://code.openhub.net/search?s=%22import%20org.jdom%22
> [4] https://github.com/search?q=%22import+org.jdom.%22&type=Code
> [5] http://code.openhub.net/search?s=%22import%20javax.xml.stream%22
> [6] https://github.com/search?q=%22import+javax.xml.stream%22&type=Code
> [7] http://code.openhub.net/search?s=%22import%20org.jdom2%22
> [8] https://github.com/search?q=%22import+org.jdom2%22&type=Code
>
> On 06/10/2015 03:53 PM, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
>>
>> On 10/06/15 21:47, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
>>> +1 for removing DOM4J, it's been dead for 10 years.
>>> But why do we need a non w3c library at all? Why is JDOM better than DOM?
>>> The main reason is that it is supposedly easier to use for Java
>>> programmers, but is it that much easier to justify having different
>>> APIs? The standard DOM is part of the Java language.
>> Well... my experience in the ActiveMath group with quite several
>> developers is that JDOM is way easier at representing properly the fine
>> details of XML in its completeness than DOM. Also, we ran experiment
>> with the Xerces DOM implementation around 2005 or so, and basically got
>> the following time factors
>> - Xerces DOM: 4
>> - Xerces SAX with JDOM: 2
>> - Saxon SAX with JDOM: 1
>> So we kept the latest. Note that Xerces is what's inside Oracle's JVM
>> (or used to be).
>> Memory was also considerably better using JDOM.
>>
>> The modern way would be to go for StAX but that is a huge programming
>> change.
>>
>> paul
>>
>>
>>


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to