No I don't have any valid use case for this character (did not even know what it was) but what I know is that you can have it :)
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Paul Libbrecht <[email protected]> wrote: > export the character "0x1" ??? > This seems like a character for the old 7-bit-modem-based terminals. > > I believe this one should just be prohibited at the entrance level. > I do not know of any valid meaning for this character. > Do you have such? > > Paul > > >> Thomas Mortagne <mailto:[email protected]> >> 22 February 2016 at 12:06 >> As recommended by W3C we are manipulating XML 1.0 in XAR format but >> what I did not know is that XML 1.0 does not support all possible >> characters (I tough at worst it would simply be encoded as a UTF8 >> entity but seems not) and we just got a report of Woodstox failing >> because of some character it cannot write in XML 1.0 (""Invalid white >> space character (0x1) in text to output (in xml 1.1, could output as a >> character entity)"). >> >> So I'm wondering if we should move to XML 1.1. It's critical IMO that >> we are able to export anything that can be stored in XWikiDocument and >> in the database and it's the case here. >> >> In theory this is most probably a breakage for people using a XML 1.0 >> parser but not sure how breaking it is in practice. >> >> WDYT ? >> >> I'm +1 for this but I won't apply it until I get more point of view >> (ideally from people having more experience that me on XML 1.0 vs >> 1.1). >> > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs -- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
