Note that it looks like the old packager plugin (based on dom4j) does
not complain and produce a  in this case (which the XML parser
does not like too much...).

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Thomas Mortagne
<[email protected]> wrote:
> No I don't have any valid use case for this character (did not even
> know what it was) but what I know is that you can have it :)
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Paul Libbrecht <[email protected]> wrote:
>> export the character "0x1" ???
>> This seems like a character for the old 7-bit-modem-based terminals.
>>
>> I believe this one should just be prohibited at the entrance level.
>> I do not know of any valid meaning for this character.
>> Do you have such?
>>
>> Paul
>>
>>
>>> Thomas Mortagne <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> 22 February 2016 at 12:06
>>> As recommended by W3C we are manipulating XML 1.0 in XAR format but
>>> what I did not know is that XML 1.0 does not support all possible
>>> characters (I tough at worst it would simply be encoded as a UTF8
>>> entity but seems not) and we just got a report of Woodstox failing
>>> because of some character it cannot write in XML 1.0 (""Invalid white
>>> space character (0x1) in text to output (in xml 1.1, could output as a
>>> character entity)").
>>>
>>> So I'm wondering if we should move to XML 1.1. It's critical IMO that
>>> we are able to export anything that can be stored in XWikiDocument and
>>> in the database and it's the case here.
>>>
>>> In theory this is most probably a breakage for people using a XML 1.0
>>> parser but not sure how breaking it is in practice.
>>>
>>> WDYT ?
>>>
>>> I'm +1 for this but I won't apply it until I get more point of view
>>> (ideally from people having more experience that me on XML 1.0 vs
>>> 1.1).
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> devs mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas Mortagne



-- 
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to