+1 I just checked https://www.w3.org/TR/xml11/#sec-xml11 and I think the breakage is acceptable.
Thanks, Marius On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> wrote: > As recommended by W3C we are manipulating XML 1.0 in XAR format but > what I did not know is that XML 1.0 does not support all possible > characters (I tough at worst it would simply be encoded as a UTF8 > entity but seems not) and we just got a report of Woodstox failing > because of some character it cannot write in XML 1.0 (""Invalid white > space character (0x1) in text to output (in xml 1.1, could output as a > character entity)"). > > So I'm wondering if we should move to XML 1.1. It's critical IMO that > we are able to export anything that can be stored in XWikiDocument and > in the database and it's the case here. > > In theory this is most probably a breakage for people using a XML 1.0 > parser but not sure how breaking it is in practice. > > WDYT ? > > I'm +1 for this but I won't apply it until I get more point of view > (ideally from people having more experience that me on XML 1.0 vs > 1.1). > > -- > Thomas Mortagne > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
