Votes so far on layout: 1. +1 (Ludovic), +1 (Caleb) 2. +1 (GD), +1 (Marius), +1 (Vincent) 3. +1 (GL)
After more discussions the vote swifted towards: 1. +1 (Ludovic), +1 (Caleb), +0 (Marius), +0 (Vincent) 2. +1 (GD), +1 (Marius), +1 (Vincent) 3. +1 (GL) My preference goes to 2. I vote for 2 since I believe that the Tree is already in the Breadcrumb, and the breadcrumb is introduced by the Tour. I vote for 2 since we have scalability issues that I believe they will pose some problems on the long run for the users. The only advantage var 1 has is that it displays the tree from the start to the user. But after a time the user will be 'forced' to configure its wiki and remove it. Each time the user will install a new app, both the Appbar and the Tree will increase in size. I like much more the classic AppBar navigation pattern and I think XWiki's greater strength is in applications. We are lacking now multiple flavors that could showcase both the KB and Groupware cases, but if I were to choose a default, that would be Groupware. So on V1 I will be +0, but definitely -1 on V3. Votes so far: 1. +1 (Ludovic), +1 (Caleb), +0 (Marius), +0 (Vincent), +0 (Caty) 2. +1 (GD), +1 (Marius), +1 (Vincent), +1 (Caty) 3. +1 (GL), -1 (Caty) Thanks, Caty On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Caleb James DeLisle <[email protected]> wrote: > I disagree with this point, as a user of web interfaces I don't care if > they look completely busted as long as I can make use of them, even if they > become unusable in 5% of the situations, that's 95% where I can use them. > > Granted if we ship something that looks broken it's an embarassement but > if we ship something that a person cannot navigate then we don't even have > them complaining at us, they just become another silent non-adopter. > > > On 08/06/16 11:01, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote: > >> So I think version (1) looks good but it doesn't scale with what we have >> right now. Thus I'm more in favour of solution (2), at least until we can >> resize the panel width. >> > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
