On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Guillaume,
>
> Thanks for starting this thread.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Current Drawer analysis:
>
> Languages            ( L / G )
> ---
> Home                     ( G )                      [N]
> ---
> Administer wiki       ( L )           [A] [W]
> ---
> Wiki Index               ( G )      [I]      [W]
> Page Index             ( L )       [I]
> User Index              ( L / G ) [I]
> Applications Index  ( L)        [I]
> ---
> Create wiki              ( G )          [A] [W]
> ---
> Delete wiki               ( L )          [A] [W]
>
>
> L = Local/Wiki setting/action/effect
> G = Global/Farm setting/action/effect
>
> N = Navigation
> A = Action
> W = Wiki entity
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Some examples of grouping:
> 1. Local / Global effect grouping (ex. Main/Subwiki actions should be
> grouped)
> 2. Entities grouping (Wiki related actions should be grouped: create,
> administer, delete, etc.)
> 3. Index grouping (group all index applications together)
> 4. Navigation grouping (to Main wiki or other wikis)
> 5. Actions grouping
> 6. other?
>
> So the main question is what grouping would we want to prioritize first:
> 1-5?
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Some things to consider:
> A. Naming consistency:
>


> A1. Across wiki: we need to consider the terms usage. For example Home vs.
> Homepage; Wiki vs. Subwiki; Settings vs. Administration; Wiki Index vs.
> Browse all wikis vs. Show all wikis
> -- We need to align these usages and pick the one most relevant for the end
> user and correct as terminology
>

+1, Pages/Users/Applications is not consistent with "Show all wikis" in P5.
Using simply "Wikis" would be more consistent.


> A2. Across the menu: this implies having all entries plural/singular or
> having the same additional text (ex. do we mark Indexes the same way?
> Administer wiki / Delete this wiki / Create a new wiki, etc.)
>
> B. Explicit (vs. Cryptic)
> -- how explicit should we make the labels vs. icons usage
>
> C. Quick access to local actions
> -- in subwikis we should optimize for local actions and try to display them
> first, since some teams might have dedicated wikis and the main wiki could
> be used just as a portal or as a farm
>
> D. Order most used actions first
> -- for example 'Delete wiki' is not a very used action
>
> E. Navigation vs. Actions grouping
> E1. Actions removal
>


> -- for example we could even remove 'Delete wiki' action and consider that
> the wiki management actions can be accessed just from Wiki Index
>

+1. I would also remove Create Wiki. A single entry to "Manage Wikis" where
you can view, create and delete wikis is better IMO.


> -- this would mean that 'Administrate wiki' would be removed too, and we
> use that action a lot in the initial configuration phases, so that would
> increase the time to reach Administration
>

-1 wiki administration is a very common action for admins.

Thanks,
Marius


> E2. Adding more wiki navigation
> -- For example http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-12538 talks about having
> a way to add quick access to other subwikis (ideally as favorites, since
> listing all wikis does not scale)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Proposals grouping feedback:
> Current. -1 (Local/Global), -2 (Wiki grouping), +3 (Indexes), partial 4
> (Navigation), -5 (Actions) || +A2 (Naming consistency), -C (Quick access)
> P1. -1 (Local/Global), partial 2 (Wiki grouping), +3 (indexes), partial 4
> (Navigation), partial 5 (Actions)  || +A2 (Naming consistency), -C (Quick
> access)
> P2. partial 1 (Local/Global), -2 (Wiki grouping), partial 3 (Indexes), -4
> (Navigation), -5 (Actions) || +A2 (Naming consistency), +C (Quick access)
> P3. partial 1 (Local/Global), -2 (Wiki grouping), +3 (Indexes), -4
> (Navigation), -5 (Actions) || +A2 (Naming consistency), +C (Quick access)
> P4. -1 (Local/Global), partial 2 (Wiki grouping), +3 (Indexes), -4
> (Navigation), +5 (Actions) || +A2 (Naming consistency), partial C (Quick
> access)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> The problem is that when you approach an usability problem using these kind
> of grouping / grading it's very easy to fall in the 'technicalities' trap
> and not think about the user perspective.
>
> So although I understand why I proposed P1-4, for users it will not make
> sense. That's why I like P5, because the grouping comes natural and is more
> explicit, although is not using the consistent terminology.
>
> P5: +1 (Local/Global), -2 (Wiki grouping), -3 (Indexes), partial 4
> (Navigation), -5 (Actions) || -A2 (Naming consistency), -A1 (Across wiki),
> +B (Explicit), +C (Quick access to local), ? D (Most used actions)
>
> Things to fix for P5:
> - Think where to fit the "Languages"
> - A1 + A2: we need to think about the naming of Indexes (especially Wiki
> Index in this case) and fix them in drawer and across; replace Settings
> with Administration; fix the "Go to ..."; consistent actions naming.
>
> Additionally we should fix A1 (see http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-9363
> )
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Before starting this thread I tried to rethink about a new solution and I
> came up with
> P6: -1 (Local/Global), +2 (Wiki grouping), +3 (Indexes), +4 (Navigation),
> +5 (Actions) || +A2 (Naming consistency), -A1 (Across wiki), -B
> (Cryptic/Iconography), -C (Quick access), ? D (Most used actions), +E2
> (More navigation)
>
> i) Having Indexes listed before local actions (will give a -C for quick
> access), but the advantage is that the menu composition will change less if
> we visit main wiki vs. subwikis. P5 also have this propety.
>
> ii) I've grouped and added more navigation by providing the list of wikis.
> There are several problems with this approach:
> ii.1 - not scalable for large number of wikis (even though I've put an
> accordion there)
> ii.2 - cryptic actions (icon usage for Create, Administration, Delete wiki)
> ii.3 - mobile issues (because the icons are very small and we will need a
> different layout for mobiles or we might have problems with large wiki
> names)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks,
> Caty
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Miroslav Galajda <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi, I vote for P5 proposal.
> >
> > Mirec
> >
> > On 26 October 2016 at 10:28, Guillaume Delhumeau <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > No opinion?
> > >
> > > 2016-10-24 18:09 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Delhumeau <
> > > [email protected]>:
> > >
> > > > Hello dear developers and XWiki users.
> > > >
> > > > I would you to take a look at the issue
> http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/
> > > > XWIKI-13070.
> > > >
> > > > The problem is that the current order (that I have implemented based
> on
> > > my
> > > > intuition) seems to not be clear for our users. The main point is
> that
> > > the
> > > > menu mixes up global items (Home wiki, Wiki Index) and local ones
> > > > (Administer Wiki, Page Index, Delete wiki, etc...).
> > > >
> > > > Caty and Oliver have made some proposals that you could find in the
> > > issue.
> > > >
> > > > They are called P1, P2, P3, P4 and P5.
> > > >
> > > > I propose you to express your preferences so we can implement it
> based
> > on
> > > > a consensus.
> > > >
> > > > Here are mine:
> > > >
> > > > P1: There is a logical order and separation between item. However, it
> > > > seems the more used actions (Wiki Index, Page Index) are less visible
> > > than
> > > > some other (Delete Wiki, Create Wiki...)
> > > >
> > > > P2: The order and the separation are logic. The "delete wiki" action
> is
> > > > still very visible but all other items are good.
> > > >
> > > > P3: Same than P2. Except that having "Wiki Index" along with "User,
> > Page
> > > > and Application Index" mixes up local and global items.
> > > >
> > > > P4: Why not, but maybe the 3 first actions should be placed after the
> > > > other ones, since they would be less used. Same remark about the
> mixing
> > > of
> > > > local and global items.
> > > >
> > > > P5: A clear distinction between local and global scope. More used
> items
> > > > are located first. This is my favorite one.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > So +1 for P5, +0 for the other options so far.
> > > >
> > > > Now, what about you?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Guillaume
> > > >
> > > > PS: I send this message to both devs and users mailing lists,
> because I
> > > > think users are directly concerned by this topic.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Guillaume Delhumeau ([email protected])
> > > > Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
> > > > Committer on the XWiki.org project
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Guillaume Delhumeau ([email protected])
> > > Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
> > > Committer on the XWiki.org project
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > users mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to