On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Guillaume Delhumeau <
[email protected]> wrote:

> 2016-11-17 16:18 GMT+01:00 Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <[email protected]>:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Guillaume Delhumeau <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > According to your suggestions, I have started some iterations in a real
> > > wiki.
> > >
> > > Proposition 8, iteration 1
> > > ==================
> > > http://jira.xwiki.org/secure/attachment/33243/P8_iter1.png
> > >
> > > * Same wording
> > > * Separation between wiki-related items and global items
> > > * Remove "Home", because it's already in the breadcrumb and it is not
> > > necessary to have it in this "often used features" menu.
> > >  "Create Wiki" and "Delete Wiki", because it should be done inside the
> > Wiki
> > > Index.
> > >
> > >
> > Some remarks:
> > - We don't use officially the "subwiki" term. We have just "Wiki", see
> > http://markmail.org/message/cehvpds5qmljq5f7
> > - In Olivier's proposal there was also the name of the subwiki which was
> > somehow interesting
> > - There is an inconsistency between "Subwiki" and "Global actions" ...
> they
> > should be similar in terms of naming structure (with or without
> "actions")
> > - If you remove "Create wiki" and "Delete wiki" then I don't see such a
> > need for the "subwiki-global" separation, since "Wiki Index" will be
> lonely
> >
>
> I don't see this as a problem. An item could be lonely.
>
>
> > -- We said we move "Create wiki" in the Wiki Index, but there we will
> have
> > other problems in terms of displaying the option: will be make it part of
> > the Create step? Do we create a separate button for it? How do we display
> > it?
> >
>
> I don't understand your question. Previously, we had a "Create wiki" link
> in the Wiki Index. We have removed it because we put it into the Create
> button instead when that button was on the top bar.
>
> Now we don't have the add button on the top bar anymore, so the "Create
> Wiki" link could go back to the Wiki Index.
>
>
> > - For wikis that allow just local users, the breadcrumb home doesn't take
> > you to the Global home, but removing "Home" won't impact in this case,
> > since apparently we don't display Home at all in this case. The problem
> is
> > that for these cases, the users won't know how to go back to the main
> wiki.
> >
>
> Yes, it's a "feature" :) On a farm, the system administrator may want to
> hide the other wikis to the users. For example, if your farm host a
> "cocacola" and a "pepsi" wiki, you could decide to hide this fact to their
> users :)
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> > > Proposition 8, iteration 2
> > > ==================
> > > On subwiki:
> > > http://jira.xwiki.org/secure/attachment/33245/P8_iter2.png
> > >
> > > On main wiki:
> > > http://jira.xwiki.org/secure/attachment/33246/P8_iter2_mainwiki.png
> > >
> > > * Same but with a more human wording
> > > * Applications is displayed before users, because I think we more often
> > > need to use an app than we need to see other users
> > >
> >
> > - Administration is a "human" wording and also it's used across our
> > documentation and interface. Also it goes hand in hand with the
> > Administrator user. I don't see big improvements in changing to the
> > "Settings" wording.
> > - There is a problem with "All Users" since in some setups, where you
> have
> > local users, that link won't take you to "all" users. Again hard to say
> > that it's really a correct separation.
> > - Regarding the order, we should define a rule. It could either be
> > alphabetical or usage (although that is hard to compute). With the
> mention
> > that extremes are easier to access. So for example first and last items
> in
> > a list are easier to access than intermediary items: so placing users
> after
> > applications, because applications are more used, it will have the
> > consequence that, being the last item in the list, it will make Users be
> > easily to access than Applications.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Proposition 8, iteration 3
> > > ==================
> > > http://jira.xwiki.org/secure/attachment/33247/P8_iter3.png
> > >
> > > * Same but introduced the "Recent Changes" entry (leads to an Activity
> > > Stream maybe)
> > >
> >
> > - Regarding the "Recent Changes" this could be see as application, so it
> > could be available in the Application Index (kind of is, but as part of
> > Dashboard).
> >
>
> I still believe it make sense to have it here. It would be the a link to
> the Activity Steam of the current wiki (since it's on the local items
> category).
>
>
> >
> >
> > >
> > > My conclusions
> > > ===
> > >
> >
> > - The problem is that if I read my comments and I remove the P8's
> > subwiki/global separation (since Wiki Index is alone) + remove the
> "Create
> > and Delete wiki" since we say they will be available in Wiki Index,
> remove
> > the Home navigation since we rely on breadcrumbs, plus we keep the same
> > wording, but maybe change a bit the Index order, we will have P9:
> > http://jira.xwiki.org/secure/attachment/33250/P9.png
> >
> > And it doesn't quite have much of a change in it if we compare it to the
> > current version. This might be good or bad. Following Jan-Paul comment
> that
> > we should not advertise for 'Delete wiki' and that 'Create wiki' is very
> > rare, we might say P9 contains just the needed elements: Administration +
> > Indexes.
> >
>
> Indeed, it's a bit disappointing...
>

Yes, it seems disappointing. Now depends what the objective is: having a
redesign of the Drawer or simplifying it.


>
>
> >
> > Since the only difference between simple users and admins would be the
> > "Administration", we could have it last as P9.1 + try a simpler naming:
> > http://jira.xwiki.org/secure/attachment/33251/P9.1.png
> >
> > But now we will need to find a way to Create wikis.
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Now regarding Index naming. If we use:
> > - Manage: for example "Manage Wikis", it will be harder to make it
> > consistent with the other Indexes, since for example User Index does not
> > provide the management setting (they are in administration). Also for
> > simple users, manage verb doesn't mean anything.
> > - All: all is complicated for farm setup, where "All Users" might mean
> just
> > local users, same for Applications and Pages, since they are just local,
> so
> > they are not all.
> > - Index: it is a bit more ambiguous, but it better satisfy the duality of
> > content.
> > - //simple: Having just "Pages", "Users", etc. can be also a solution.
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Regarding Olivier's comment about "Recent changes" (in P7). I agree that
> > the majority of wikis provide it, still we should find a solution to what
> > will we present to the user (Olivier suggested a livetable so I guess he
> > doesn't know our Activity Stream). Will it redirect to Main.Activity?
> Which
> > one? The local or the global one? It could be the global one since we
> > display the wiki prefixes, but I guess this again depends on the type of
> > wiki you are located in.
> >
> > Regarding P7 I don't like it especially because it's removing Page Index
> > (and relies on a panel that can be change depending on the current
> Flavor)
> > and removes Application Index (with the rationale that AppBar is
> complete,
> > which it isn't and again the panels can be easily changed).
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Caty
> >
> >
> > >
> > > * Better look & feel
> > > * More human wording
> > > * Only feature we need often
> > >
> > > Is it going in the right direction?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Guillaume
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > devs mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > devs mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Guillaume Delhumeau ([email protected])
> Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
> Committer on the XWiki.org project
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to