Thanks for your ideas. Any other?

2016-10-31 10:21 GMT+01:00 Marius Dumitru Florea <
[email protected]>:

> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Guillaume,
> >
> > Thanks for starting this thread.
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > Current Drawer analysis:
> >
> > Languages            ( L / G )
> > ---
> > Home                     ( G )                      [N]
> > ---
> > Administer wiki       ( L )           [A] [W]
> > ---
> > Wiki Index               ( G )      [I]      [W]
> > Page Index             ( L )       [I]
> > User Index              ( L / G ) [I]
> > Applications Index  ( L)        [I]
> > ---
> > Create wiki              ( G )          [A] [W]
> > ---
> > Delete wiki               ( L )          [A] [W]
> >
> >
> > L = Local/Wiki setting/action/effect
> > G = Global/Farm setting/action/effect
> >
> > N = Navigation
> > A = Action
> > W = Wiki entity
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Some examples of grouping:
> > 1. Local / Global effect grouping (ex. Main/Subwiki actions should be
> > grouped)
> > 2. Entities grouping (Wiki related actions should be grouped: create,
> > administer, delete, etc.)
> > 3. Index grouping (group all index applications together)
> > 4. Navigation grouping (to Main wiki or other wikis)
> > 5. Actions grouping
> > 6. other?
> >
> > So the main question is what grouping would we want to prioritize first:
> > 1-5?
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Some things to consider:
> > A. Naming consistency:
> >
>
>
> > A1. Across wiki: we need to consider the terms usage. For example Home
> vs.
> > Homepage; Wiki vs. Subwiki; Settings vs. Administration; Wiki Index vs.
> > Browse all wikis vs. Show all wikis
> > -- We need to align these usages and pick the one most relevant for the
> end
> > user and correct as terminology
> >
>
> +1, Pages/Users/Applications is not consistent with "Show all wikis" in P5.
> Using simply "Wikis" would be more consistent.
>
>
> > A2. Across the menu: this implies having all entries plural/singular or
> > having the same additional text (ex. do we mark Indexes the same way?
> > Administer wiki / Delete this wiki / Create a new wiki, etc.)
> >
> > B. Explicit (vs. Cryptic)
> > -- how explicit should we make the labels vs. icons usage
> >
> > C. Quick access to local actions
> > -- in subwikis we should optimize for local actions and try to display
> them
> > first, since some teams might have dedicated wikis and the main wiki
> could
> > be used just as a portal or as a farm
> >
> > D. Order most used actions first
> > -- for example 'Delete wiki' is not a very used action
> >
> > E. Navigation vs. Actions grouping
> > E1. Actions removal
> >
>
>
> > -- for example we could even remove 'Delete wiki' action and consider
> that
> > the wiki management actions can be accessed just from Wiki Index
> >
>
> +1. I would also remove Create Wiki. A single entry to "Manage Wikis" where
> you can view, create and delete wikis is better IMO.
>
>
> > -- this would mean that 'Administrate wiki' would be removed too, and we
> > use that action a lot in the initial configuration phases, so that would
> > increase the time to reach Administration
> >
>
> -1 wiki administration is a very common action for admins.
>
> Thanks,
> Marius
>
>
> > E2. Adding more wiki navigation
> > -- For example http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-12538 talks about
> having
> > a way to add quick access to other subwikis (ideally as favorites, since
> > listing all wikis does not scale)
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Proposals grouping feedback:
> > Current. -1 (Local/Global), -2 (Wiki grouping), +3 (Indexes), partial 4
> > (Navigation), -5 (Actions) || +A2 (Naming consistency), -C (Quick access)
> > P1. -1 (Local/Global), partial 2 (Wiki grouping), +3 (indexes), partial 4
> > (Navigation), partial 5 (Actions)  || +A2 (Naming consistency), -C (Quick
> > access)
> > P2. partial 1 (Local/Global), -2 (Wiki grouping), partial 3 (Indexes), -4
> > (Navigation), -5 (Actions) || +A2 (Naming consistency), +C (Quick access)
> > P3. partial 1 (Local/Global), -2 (Wiki grouping), +3 (Indexes), -4
> > (Navigation), -5 (Actions) || +A2 (Naming consistency), +C (Quick access)
> > P4. -1 (Local/Global), partial 2 (Wiki grouping), +3 (Indexes), -4
> > (Navigation), +5 (Actions) || +A2 (Naming consistency), partial C (Quick
> > access)
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > The problem is that when you approach an usability problem using these
> kind
> > of grouping / grading it's very easy to fall in the 'technicalities' trap
> > and not think about the user perspective.
> >
> > So although I understand why I proposed P1-4, for users it will not make
> > sense. That's why I like P5, because the grouping comes natural and is
> more
> > explicit, although is not using the consistent terminology.
> >
> > P5: +1 (Local/Global), -2 (Wiki grouping), -3 (Indexes), partial 4
> > (Navigation), -5 (Actions) || -A2 (Naming consistency), -A1 (Across
> wiki),
> > +B (Explicit), +C (Quick access to local), ? D (Most used actions)
> >
> > Things to fix for P5:
> > - Think where to fit the "Languages"
> > - A1 + A2: we need to think about the naming of Indexes (especially Wiki
> > Index in this case) and fix them in drawer and across; replace Settings
> > with Administration; fix the "Go to ..."; consistent actions naming.
> >
> > Additionally we should fix A1 (see http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/
> XWIKI-9363
> > )
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Before starting this thread I tried to rethink about a new solution and I
> > came up with
> > P6: -1 (Local/Global), +2 (Wiki grouping), +3 (Indexes), +4 (Navigation),
> > +5 (Actions) || +A2 (Naming consistency), -A1 (Across wiki), -B
> > (Cryptic/Iconography), -C (Quick access), ? D (Most used actions), +E2
> > (More navigation)
> >
> > i) Having Indexes listed before local actions (will give a -C for quick
> > access), but the advantage is that the menu composition will change less
> if
> > we visit main wiki vs. subwikis. P5 also have this propety.
> >
> > ii) I've grouped and added more navigation by providing the list of
> wikis.
> > There are several problems with this approach:
> > ii.1 - not scalable for large number of wikis (even though I've put an
> > accordion there)
> > ii.2 - cryptic actions (icon usage for Create, Administration, Delete
> wiki)
> > ii.3 - mobile issues (because the icons are very small and we will need a
> > different layout for mobiles or we might have problems with large wiki
> > names)
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Caty
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Miroslav Galajda <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, I vote for P5 proposal.
> > >
> > > Mirec
> > >
> > > On 26 October 2016 at 10:28, Guillaume Delhumeau <
> > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > No opinion?
> > > >
> > > > 2016-10-24 18:09 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Delhumeau <
> > > > [email protected]>:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello dear developers and XWiki users.
> > > > >
> > > > > I would you to take a look at the issue
> > http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/
> > > > > XWIKI-13070.
> > > > >
> > > > > The problem is that the current order (that I have implemented
> based
> > on
> > > > my
> > > > > intuition) seems to not be clear for our users. The main point is
> > that
> > > > the
> > > > > menu mixes up global items (Home wiki, Wiki Index) and local ones
> > > > > (Administer Wiki, Page Index, Delete wiki, etc...).
> > > > >
> > > > > Caty and Oliver have made some proposals that you could find in the
> > > > issue.
> > > > >
> > > > > They are called P1, P2, P3, P4 and P5.
> > > > >
> > > > > I propose you to express your preferences so we can implement it
> > based
> > > on
> > > > > a consensus.
> > > > >
> > > > > Here are mine:
> > > > >
> > > > > P1: There is a logical order and separation between item. However,
> it
> > > > > seems the more used actions (Wiki Index, Page Index) are less
> visible
> > > > than
> > > > > some other (Delete Wiki, Create Wiki...)
> > > > >
> > > > > P2: The order and the separation are logic. The "delete wiki"
> action
> > is
> > > > > still very visible but all other items are good.
> > > > >
> > > > > P3: Same than P2. Except that having "Wiki Index" along with "User,
> > > Page
> > > > > and Application Index" mixes up local and global items.
> > > > >
> > > > > P4: Why not, but maybe the 3 first actions should be placed after
> the
> > > > > other ones, since they would be less used. Same remark about the
> > mixing
> > > > of
> > > > > local and global items.
> > > > >
> > > > > P5: A clear distinction between local and global scope. More used
> > items
> > > > > are located first. This is my favorite one.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > So +1 for P5, +0 for the other options so far.
> > > > >
> > > > > Now, what about you?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Guillaume
> > > > >
> > > > > PS: I send this message to both devs and users mailing lists,
> > because I
> > > > > think users are directly concerned by this topic.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Guillaume Delhumeau ([email protected])
> > > > > Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
> > > > > Committer on the XWiki.org project
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Guillaume Delhumeau ([email protected])
> > > > Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
> > > > Committer on the XWiki.org project
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > users mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > users mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > devs mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> >
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>



-- 
Guillaume Delhumeau ([email protected])
Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
Committer on the XWiki.org project
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to