Already exist: http://l10n.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/L10NCode/BestContributorsSheet?lowerBound=201601201&upperBound=20170106
What is missing is find out the dates to pass as parameters. On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Vincent Massol <vinc...@massol.net> wrote: > >> On 6 Feb 2017, at 10:39, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.morta...@xwiki.com> wrote: >> >> +1 for adding any source of contributions as long as it's automated or >> close to automated (like executing one command/request and >> copy/pasting the result) > > @Thomas: Could I let you write some script to generate: > "B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of the > release development.” > > ? > > :) > > So the idea is to give a start and end date and get the list of translators > during that period. > > Thanks > -Vincent > >> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea >> <mariusdumitru.flo...@xwiki.com> wrote: >>> +1 >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Marius >>> >>> On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Vincent Massol <vinc...@massol.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi devs, >>>> >>>> Right now we’ve started acknowledging the committers in the Release notes. >>>> >>>> I’d like to propose to extend that try to ack everyone who participates in >>>> one way or another to a release, and not just developers. >>>> >>>> I can think of 3 more items to add: >>>> >>>> A) All the JIRA issue reporters that have had an issue fixed for the >>>> release (bug, improvement, new feature, etc). They took the time to report >>>> an issue and thus they’ve helped the committers to improve the quality of >>>> the release and thus they should be acknowledged. This allows us to also >>>> ack QA. We could decide to exclude the reporters who’ve also been >>>> committers or leave them in. >>>> >>>> B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of the >>>> release development. >>>> >>>> Ideally we would also ack: >>>> >>>> C) The people who’ve helped on the list for the release >>>> D) The people who’ve helped on the Design and made proposals that made it >>>> to the release. I’m thinking of Caty for example. Luckily Caty also commits >>>> some code and often she’s recognised through commits. >>>> >>>> The problem with C) and D) is that they’re hard to gather. But we could do >>>> it on an ad-hoc basis by adding them to the RN during the development (when >>>> they help) instead of doing it at the end. >>>> >>>> In any case I’d like to focus on A) and B) FTM and I’m proposing to add >>>> them to the Release Plan since they’re easy to find out. >>>> >>>> WDYT? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> -Vincent >>>> >>>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Thomas Mortagne > -- Thomas Mortagne
