There is a typo in the previous URL: http://l10n.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/L10NCode/BestContributorsSheet?lowerBound=20161201&upperBound=20170106
I'm surprised $datetool.toDate does not complain about a weird date like "201601201". On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:35 PM, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.morta...@xwiki.com> wrote: > Already exist: > http://l10n.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/L10NCode/BestContributorsSheet?lowerBound=201601201&upperBound=20170106 > > What is missing is find out the dates to pass as parameters. > > On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Vincent Massol <vinc...@massol.net> wrote: >> >>> On 6 Feb 2017, at 10:39, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.morta...@xwiki.com> wrote: >>> >>> +1 for adding any source of contributions as long as it's automated or >>> close to automated (like executing one command/request and >>> copy/pasting the result) >> >> @Thomas: Could I let you write some script to generate: >> "B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of the >> release development.” >> >> ? >> >> :) >> >> So the idea is to give a start and end date and get the list of translators >> during that period. >> >> Thanks >> -Vincent >> >>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea >>> <mariusdumitru.flo...@xwiki.com> wrote: >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Marius >>>> >>>> On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Vincent Massol <vinc...@massol.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi devs, >>>>> >>>>> Right now we’ve started acknowledging the committers in the Release notes. >>>>> >>>>> I’d like to propose to extend that try to ack everyone who participates in >>>>> one way or another to a release, and not just developers. >>>>> >>>>> I can think of 3 more items to add: >>>>> >>>>> A) All the JIRA issue reporters that have had an issue fixed for the >>>>> release (bug, improvement, new feature, etc). They took the time to report >>>>> an issue and thus they’ve helped the committers to improve the quality of >>>>> the release and thus they should be acknowledged. This allows us to also >>>>> ack QA. We could decide to exclude the reporters who’ve also been >>>>> committers or leave them in. >>>>> >>>>> B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of the >>>>> release development. >>>>> >>>>> Ideally we would also ack: >>>>> >>>>> C) The people who’ve helped on the list for the release >>>>> D) The people who’ve helped on the Design and made proposals that made it >>>>> to the release. I’m thinking of Caty for example. Luckily Caty also >>>>> commits >>>>> some code and often she’s recognised through commits. >>>>> >>>>> The problem with C) and D) is that they’re hard to gather. But we could do >>>>> it on an ad-hoc basis by adding them to the RN during the development >>>>> (when >>>>> they help) instead of doing it at the end. >>>>> >>>>> In any case I’d like to focus on A) and B) FTM and I’m proposing to add >>>>> them to the Release Plan since they’re easy to find out. >>>>> >>>>> WDYT? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> -Vincent >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Thomas Mortagne >> > > > > -- > Thomas Mortagne -- Thomas Mortagne
