(This is all modifications made to documents containing a translation object)
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:45 PM, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.morta...@xwiki.com> wrote: > There is a typo in the previous URL: > http://l10n.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/L10NCode/BestContributorsSheet?lowerBound=20161201&upperBound=20170106 > > I'm surprised $datetool.toDate does not complain about a weird date > like "201601201". > > On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:35 PM, Thomas Mortagne > <thomas.morta...@xwiki.com> wrote: >> Already exist: >> http://l10n.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/L10NCode/BestContributorsSheet?lowerBound=201601201&upperBound=20170106 >> >> What is missing is find out the dates to pass as parameters. >> >> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Vincent Massol <vinc...@massol.net> wrote: >>> >>>> On 6 Feb 2017, at 10:39, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.morta...@xwiki.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 for adding any source of contributions as long as it's automated or >>>> close to automated (like executing one command/request and >>>> copy/pasting the result) >>> >>> @Thomas: Could I let you write some script to generate: >>> "B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of the >>> release development.” >>> >>> ? >>> >>> :) >>> >>> So the idea is to give a start and end date and get the list of translators >>> during that period. >>> >>> Thanks >>> -Vincent >>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea >>>> <mariusdumitru.flo...@xwiki.com> wrote: >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Marius >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Vincent Massol <vinc...@massol.net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi devs, >>>>>> >>>>>> Right now we’ve started acknowledging the committers in the Release >>>>>> notes. >>>>>> >>>>>> I’d like to propose to extend that try to ack everyone who participates >>>>>> in >>>>>> one way or another to a release, and not just developers. >>>>>> >>>>>> I can think of 3 more items to add: >>>>>> >>>>>> A) All the JIRA issue reporters that have had an issue fixed for the >>>>>> release (bug, improvement, new feature, etc). They took the time to >>>>>> report >>>>>> an issue and thus they’ve helped the committers to improve the quality of >>>>>> the release and thus they should be acknowledged. This allows us to also >>>>>> ack QA. We could decide to exclude the reporters who’ve also been >>>>>> committers or leave them in. >>>>>> >>>>>> B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of the >>>>>> release development. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ideally we would also ack: >>>>>> >>>>>> C) The people who’ve helped on the list for the release >>>>>> D) The people who’ve helped on the Design and made proposals that made it >>>>>> to the release. I’m thinking of Caty for example. Luckily Caty also >>>>>> commits >>>>>> some code and often she’s recognised through commits. >>>>>> >>>>>> The problem with C) and D) is that they’re hard to gather. But we could >>>>>> do >>>>>> it on an ad-hoc basis by adding them to the RN during the development >>>>>> (when >>>>>> they help) instead of doing it at the end. >>>>>> >>>>>> In any case I’d like to focus on A) and B) FTM and I’m proposing to add >>>>>> them to the Release Plan since they’re easy to find out. >>>>>> >>>>>> WDYT? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> -Vincent >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Thomas Mortagne >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Thomas Mortagne > > > > -- > Thomas Mortagne -- Thomas Mortagne
