> On 28 Apr 2017, at 15:55, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.morta...@xwiki.com> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Vincent Massol <vinc...@massol.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 28 Apr 2017, at 15:49, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.morta...@xwiki.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Vincent Massol <vinc...@massol.net> wrote:
>>>> Status
>>>> ======
>>>> 
>>>> So I’ve progressed in this with Kevin (who’s an infra admin at XWiki SAS).
>>>> 
>>>> We now have an instance ready.
>>>> 
>>>> What’s left to do:
>>>> 
>>>> * Configure reply by email. I’m currently trying to do that with Kevin. 
>>>> The principle is that you receive mail from discourse and we set in 
>>>> discourse a reply-to email address so that when you reply to the mail, it 
>>>> goes to a mail inbox somewhere (some gmail account for example). Then 
>>>> discourse is configured to check (using POP3, they don’t seem to support 
>>>> IMAP ATM) that inbox and to process mails found in it and update the 
>>>> topics. Note that even if we don’t configure this, users can still receive 
>>>> emails for all posts but they will just need to click on the link to go 
>>>> the webpage and answer. It’s not the end of the world either.
>>> 
>>> Does it also support starting new discussion by mail or only reply ?
>> 
>> It seems so:
>> 
>> " You can start topics, reply to topics, have a mailing list mode where you 
>> get an email per post on the forum or post on the category.
>> 
>> Longer term we plan to add some "secret commands" that allow you to like a 
>> post or flag a post via email.
>> 
>> Overall mailing list parity is pretty high here and we support a bunch of 
>> stuff mailing lists do not.”
>> 
>> From https://meta.discourse.org/t/start-a-new-topic-via-email/12477/6
> 
> In that case another idea for the migration would be to make Discourse
> monitor us...@xwiki.org instead of making it readonly.

I thought about this but AFAIU this wouldn’t work.

The email address used to reply to posts is of the form:

<prefix>+<topickey>@<domain name>

For example: discourse-replies+xx...@xwiki.org

So I don’t think it would work to POP us...@xwiki.org (and we don’t have a 
POP-able inbox for users mail either AFAIK).

Thanks
-Vincent

> 
>> 
>> Thanks
>> -Vincent
>> 
>>> 
>>>> * Decide on the migration path. See below
>>>> 
>>>> * Decide if we migrate only users or also devs. FTM I suggest that we do 
>>>> only users and see how it goes and if we’re happy we can decide to move 
>>>> devs data too.
>>>> 
>>>> Migration Path
>>>> ============
>>>> 
>>>> I propose the following:
>>>> 
>>>> * On a given date that we advertise on the users list, we configure this 
>>>> list to be readonly and not allow more posts. We invite users to register 
>>>> on our discourse instance and use that.
>>>> * We don’t import our archives since it’s complex 
>>>> (https://meta.discourse.org/t/howto-import-mbox-mailing-list-files/51233) 
>>>> and there’s not a perfect mapping. We can always do that in the future if 
>>>> someone really wants to work on that.
>>>> * We create a markmail user in our discourse instance and configure it to 
>>>> receive all posts. We set its email address to be us...@xwiki.org and we 
>>>> configure the users list to accept mail from our discourse instance. This 
>>>> allows to keep having a place where we can search in all places by using 
>>>> markmail. Incidentally this also means that nabble and gmane will continue 
>>>> to archive our mails which is nice.
>>>> 
>>>> WDYT?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> -Vincent
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On 24 Feb 2017, at 12:18, Vincent Massol <vinc...@massol.net> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi devs,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I’m proposing to vote for moving away from our users and devs mailing 
>>>>> list and instead to use the Discourse open source tool:
>>>>> 
>>>>> * Home page: http://www.discourse.org/
>>>>> * License: GPL v2
>>>>> * FAQ: http://www.discourse.org/faq/
>>>>> * Awesome feature list: http://www.discourse.org/about/
>>>>> 
>>>>> What is especially interesting for us:
>>>>> * It works with mailing lists (you can receive mails and send mails to 
>>>>> the forum).
>>>>> * Works as a forum. BTW if you want to see a real life instance, check 
>>>>> the gradle instance at https://discuss.gradle.org/
>>>>> 
>>>>> Nice things:
>>>>> * Works on mobile
>>>>> * Comprehensive API (would allow us to integrate it with xwiki.org)
>>>>> * Badges/user metrics
>>>>> 
>>>>> So here’s my +1 to try it out and ask XWiki SAS if they could host an 
>>>>> instance.
>>>>> 
>>>>> WDYT? Do you see any negative point (I don’t ATM)? :)
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please cast your votes!
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> -Vincent
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Thomas Mortagne
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Thomas Mortagne

Reply via email to