Hi, On Thu, 04-Aug-2016 13:14, Pete Muir wrote: > What about just ".cdk"?
We discussed this as well. It is an option. It does not seem to be a valid public TLD atm. However, this might change. The benefit of the other options I gave was, that they are protected by the DNS spec. Obviously, .cdk/.adb makes nicer URLs. I am fine with giving it a go. --Hardy
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Devtools mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools
