On 5 Aug 2016, at 13:01, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 04-Aug-2016 13:14, Pete Muir wrote:
What about just ".cdk"?
We discussed this as well. It is an option. It does not seem to be
a valid public TLD atm. However, this might change. The benefit of the
other options I gave was, that they are protected by the DNS spec.
Obviously, .cdk/.adb makes nicer URLs. I am fine with giving it a go.
Isn't there some caveat of some browsers/OS's not behaving nice with
such ?
I just remember when I made up my own short names in localhost and local
dns servers I ran into problems and thus started using
<something>.local.
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen
_______________________________________________
Devtools mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools
