Hi, I hate to break your heart, but just don't use xhyve. I know it is the "native" hypervisor on OS X, but imo is just not ready for prime time.
If you want to have a stable environment use VirtualBox. I use VirtualBox for development and hardly xhyve. xhyve has a tendency to hang and it as you noticed yourself handles hibernation really badly. Also, when you get into a bad state, xhyve can literally force you to restart your notebook. Btw, have I mentioned the "issues" around the fact that the xhyve driver needs to run as root, hence creating files I cannot easily delete afterwards? I have an Minishift instance running pretty much all the time and hibernate my machine as often as I like with hardly having any trouble. What is so appealing with xhyve? Is it such a hassle to install and use VirtualBox? > CDK 2.1 could also handle the laptop sleep cycle pretty well (at least 4+ > sleep/wake cycles) but I do not believe CDK 2.3 could as one sleep/wake > cycle could cause it to "eat all the CPU". Both cases used to work for me afaicr. > In my case, I always use the CDK 2.x with Virtual Box > and the Minishift CDK with Xyhve Why are you not using VirtualBox for Minishift as well? BTW, regarding the MSA example. Provisioned it just yesterday on latest Minishift version and it worked ok. --Hardy
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Devtools mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools
