On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 5:19 PM, Hardy Ferentschik <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > > Well the cool kids like James Strachan and Kamesh Sampath are telling me > > that xhyve is super awesome and I would be better looking, thinner and 10 > > years younger if I just tried it :-) > > LOL. I wonder why it is supposedly cool. It is known to misbehave and it > does > not even have a management console, leaving me sometimes wildly guessing on > what's going on. At least VirtualBox and Hyper-V offer me some way to > inspect/manage virtual machines. > > I've heard xhyve is performs better. Personally I have not tests this nor > seen any numbers. Given that I prefer a more stable environment over one > which might or might not perform a bit better, I stick to VirtualBox for > now. > > > I do not even know what files to go delete...but I do see it misbehaving. > > That might help in some cases - https://minishift.io/docs/ > troubleshooting.html#xhyve-driver > > > CDK 2.2+ uses more CPU than before - I stuck with CDK 2.1 until Jan 2017 > > for demos :-) > > I would love to know why, but trying to find the problem with CDK 2.2+ > seems pointless. > I'd rather see us working out how you can give the same presentation using > Minishift with a decent performance. > > If we could get you to use Minishift and you tell us that it performs ways > worse > than CDK 2.1, we will for sure look into it. > switching to virtualbox... :-) > > --Hardy > >
_______________________________________________ Devtools mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools
