*** From dhcp-server -- To unsubscribe, see the end of this message. ***
James C. Brost wrote:
>
> *** From dhcp-server -- To unsubscribe, see the end of this message. ***
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but it's not possible to start the server on an
> unconfigured interface
>
It definitely cannot. What I needed to do was have eth0 and eth2 get
an IP over the eth2 interface, with eth1 being statically defined as a
DHCP server. The eth0 and eth2 were dhcp clients, which I was hoping to
have both request over eth2 somehow.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
> Behalf Of Diamon
> Sent: Monday, April 05, 1999 8:19 PM
> To: Ted Lemon
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Relay/client question.
>
> *** From dhcp-server -- To unsubscribe, see the end of this message. ***
>
> >> The multi-nic system is supposed to *be* the router, but the DHCP
> >> server is on the eth2 segment. There's no way to get both eth0 and eth2
> >> to get DHCP info from eth2?
> >
> >I don't understand. Do you want to get IP addresses for eth0 and
> >eth2 from the DHCP server, or do you want clients connected to eth2 to
> >get addresses from the DHCP server connected to eth0? If the latter,
> >just run a relay agent on your router.
> >
>
> I wanted to get addresses for eth0 and eth2 over the eth2 interface.
> Sorry, I should have been more specific.
>
> >> Also, do you have any plans to support DHCP aliases? Specifically,
> I'm
> >> not sure what else besides Linux supports that, but it can't hurt to
> >> ask... I needed to see if I could get multiple IP's for one address, or
> >> addresses for multiple devices from one interface, primarily for cable
> >> modem configurations.
> >
> >What do you mean, "support DHCP aliases"?
>
> It must be no-brain day for me... What I meant was can/will DHCP get
> addresses for IP aliasing, like eth0:0 and eth0:1, etc.
>
> >
> >> Finally, I need to set the network card to promiscuous mode.
> >> Is there an option or location within the config script that I could
> >> quickly change to do this?
> >
> >Why would you want to do this?
>
> Bridging, and catching packets.
>
> >
> > _MelloN_
>
> By the way, have you ever heard of Samba not running on a DHCP system?
> I keep getting "Unable to bind to socket 139: Address 0.0.0.0:139
> already in use." It works fine on a non-DHCP system, but I wanted my
> DHCP and Samba to be the same system.
>
>
BTW, Ted, I'm now pretty darn sure that the dhcp server or the route
required to run it in Linux is keeping Samba from running, but I need to
do more testing... No time at all anymore. If anyone else could
confirm or deny dhcpd and samba not running on the same interface (one
nic), I'd be interested to know. Thanks!
Diamon
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit http://www.fugue.com/dhcp/lists
If you are without web access, or if you are having trouble with the web page,
please send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please try to use the web
page first - it will take a long time for your request to be processed by hand.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
